journal article·2021-03-01Open access

High-performance vibration power generation using polycrystalline Fe–Co-based alloy due to large inverse magnetostrictive effect

S. Inoue, T. Okada, S. Fujieda, F. Osanai, S. Hashi, K. Ishiyama, S. Suzuki, S. Seino, T. Nakagawa, T. A. Yamamoto

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 3

Abstract

The magnetic flux density change ΔB caused by the inverse magnetostrictive effect is key for achieving high-performance vibration power generation. As the magnetization curve of the polycrystalline Fe–47.6 at. % Co–2.3 at. % V (Fe–Co–V) alloy became easier to magnetize by applying tensile stresses, the value of ΔB estimated from the magnetization curves depended significantly on magnetic fields. Hence, the vibration power generation of a U-shaped unimorph device using a polycrystalline Fe–Co–V alloy core was demonstrated under various bias magnetic fields. As a result of bias magnetic field adjustment, the open-circuit voltage induced by the vibration of the device improved to ∼7.0 V. Such superior performance is attributable to a large ΔB of 1.1 T in the Fe–Co–V alloy core. Therefore, adjustment of bias magnetic fields is essential for obtaining large ΔB in Fe–Co–V alloys, which are promising inverse magnetostrictive materials for high-performance vibration power generation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Electric Motor Design and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University 1 , Suita 565-0871, Japan

Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University 2 , Sendai 980-8577, Japan

Micro System Integration Center, Tohoku University 3 , Sendai 980-8577, Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · Kansai Research Foundation · TEPCO Memorial Foundation

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 17 · R17510.1088/0957-0233/17/12/r01 ↗
2. Smart Mater. Struct. · 2017 · 26 · 10300110.1088/1361-665x/aa8347 ↗
3. Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2018 · 20 · 170074310.1002/adem.201700743 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 240710.1109/tmag.2011.2158303 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2000 · 36 · 323810.1109/20.908752 ↗
6. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. · 2006 · 17 · 11710.1177/1045389X06056060 ↗
7. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2017 · 8 · 610100410.1109/lmag.2016.2619332 ↗
8. Sens. Actuators, A · 2007 · 137 · 13410.1016/j.sna.2007.02.026 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 124 · 23390110.1063/1.5063718 ↗
10. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. · 2012 · 23 · 64710.1177/1045389x12436729 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 250520410.1109/tmag.2014.2331139 ↗
12. Smart Mater. Struct. · 2015 · 24 · 12501910.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125019 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 820130410.1109/tmag.2014.2360195 ↗
14. Mechatronics · 2019 · 63 · 10226410.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.102264 ↗
15. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 03501810.1063/1.5079882 ↗
16. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 50 · 81610.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.04.001 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 1959 · 30 · 81610.1063/1.1735247 ↗
18. Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2019 · 21 · 180081110.1002/adem.201800811 ↗
19. Materialia · 2020 · 10 · 10064410.1016/j.mtla.2020.100644 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 112 · 07390210.1063/1.5016197 ↗
21. Materials · 2018 · 11 · 40610.3390/ma11030406 ↗
22. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 514 · 16726010.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167260 ↗
23. 2000