High-performance vibration power generation using polycrystalline Fe–Co-based alloy due to large inverse magnetostrictive effect
Source abstract
Abstract
The magnetic flux density change ΔB caused by the inverse magnetostrictive effect is key for achieving high-performance vibration power generation. As the magnetization curve of the polycrystalline Fe–47.6 at. % Co–2.3 at. % V (Fe–Co–V) alloy became easier to magnetize by applying tensile stresses, the value of ΔB estimated from the magnetization curves depended significantly on magnetic fields. Hence, the vibration power generation of a U-shaped unimorph device using a polycrystalline Fe–Co–V alloy core was demonstrated under various bias magnetic fields. As a result of bias magnetic field adjustment, the open-circuit voltage induced by the vibration of the device improved to ∼7.0 V. Such superior performance is attributable to a large ΔB of 1.1 T in the Fe–Co–V alloy core. Therefore, adjustment of bias magnetic fields is essential for obtaining large ΔB in Fe–Co–V alloys, which are promising inverse magnetostrictive materials for high-performance vibration power generation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Electric Motor Design and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University 1 , Suita 565-0871, Japan
Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University 2 , Sendai 980-8577, Japan
Micro System Integration Center, Tohoku University 3 , Sendai 980-8577, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · Kansai Research Foundation · TEPCO Memorial Foundation
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 17 · R17510.1088/0957-0233/17/12/r01 ↗
2. Smart Mater. Struct. · 2017 · 26 · 10300110.1088/1361-665x/aa8347 ↗
3. Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2018 · 20 · 170074310.1002/adem.201700743 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 240710.1109/tmag.2011.2158303 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2000 · 36 · 323810.1109/20.908752 ↗
6. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. · 2006 · 17 · 11710.1177/1045389X06056060 ↗
7. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2017 · 8 · 610100410.1109/lmag.2016.2619332 ↗
8. Sens. Actuators, A · 2007 · 137 · 13410.1016/j.sna.2007.02.026 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 124 · 23390110.1063/1.5063718 ↗
10. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. · 2012 · 23 · 64710.1177/1045389x12436729 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 250520410.1109/tmag.2014.2331139 ↗
12. Smart Mater. Struct. · 2015 · 24 · 12501910.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125019 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 820130410.1109/tmag.2014.2360195 ↗
14. Mechatronics · 2019 · 63 · 10226410.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.102264 ↗
15. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 03501810.1063/1.5079882 ↗
16. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 50 · 81610.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.04.001 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 1959 · 30 · 81610.1063/1.1735247 ↗
18. Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2019 · 21 · 180081110.1002/adem.201800811 ↗
19. Materialia · 2020 · 10 · 10064410.1016/j.mtla.2020.100644 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 112 · 07390210.1063/1.5016197 ↗
21. Materials · 2018 · 11 · 40610.3390/ma11030406 ↗
22. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 514 · 16726010.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167260 ↗
23. 2000