journal article·2020-04-01Open access

A new implicit nonlinear discrete scheme for Rosenau–Burgers equation based on multiple integral finite volume method

Cui Guo, Wenjing Xue, Yinglin Wang, Zhixin Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 4

Abstract

In this paper, we study the initial-boundary value problem of the Rosenau–Burgers equation by the multiple integral finite volume method (MIFVM). The MIFVM can keep the original equation property very well. We propose a two-level implicit nonlinear discrete scheme, which preserves the energy decline property of the original equation. Existence and uniqueness of the numerical solution are derived. The convergence with the order of O(τ2 + h3) and unconditional stability of the numerical scheme are verified. Numerical examples demonstrate that the scheme is reliable and effective.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Waves and Solitons · Fractional Differential Equations Solutions · Nonlinear Photonic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Harbin Engineering University , Harbin 150001, People’s Republic of China

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Turk. J. Math. · 2018 · 42 · 37310.3906/mat-1609-69 ↗
2. Pramana · 2019 · 92 · 8410.1007/s12043-019-1751-1 ↗
3. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C · 2018 · 29 · 185004310.1142/s0129183118500432 ↗
4. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2016 · 766 · 01202810.1088/1742-6596/766/1/012028 ↗
5. Phys. Scr. · 1986 · 34 · 82710.1088/0031-8949/34/6b/020 ↗
6. Progr. Theor. Phys. · 1988 · 79 · 102810.1143/ptp.79.1028 ↗
7. Math. Appl. Comput. · 1990 · 9 · 145
8. Appl. Anal. · 2015 · 94 · 243510.1080/00036811.2014.987134 ↗
9. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. · 2017 · 40 · 198610.1002/mma.4114 ↗
10. J. Sci. Comput. · 2018 · 75 · 155510.1007/s10915-017-0598-1 ↗
11. Cankaya Univ. J. Sci. Eng. · 2015 · 12 · 1
12. Sigma. J. Eng. Nat. Sci. · 2019 · 37 · 1
13. Appl. Math. Comput. · 2008 · 204 · 31110.1016/j.amc.2008.06.051 ↗
14. Adv. Differ. Equations · 2018 · 35110.1186/s13662-018-1815-4 ↗
15. 2015
16. Numer. Methods Part Differ. Equations · 2016 · 32 · 87710.1002/num.22034 ↗
17. Appl. Math. Comput. · 2012 · 218 · 891710.1016/j.amc.2012.02.051 ↗
18. Appl. Math. Comput. · 2013 · 222 · 49010.1016/j.amc.2013.07.052 ↗
19. Adv. Math. Phys. · 2014 · 73406710.1155/2014/734067 ↗
20. J. Comput. Appl. Math. · 2017 · 318 · 61610.1016/j.cam.2015.11.015 ↗
22. Numer. Methods Part Differ. Equations · 2019 · 35 · 136310.1002/num.22354 ↗
23. Math. Probl. Eng. · 2019 · 967351410.1155/2019/9673514 ↗
24. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. · 2019 · 252 · 04209710.1088/1755-1315/252/4/042097 ↗
25. Comput. Math. Appl. · 2017 · 74 · 187110.1016/j.camwa.2017.06.054 ↗
26. Comput. Math. Appl. · 2016 · 72 · 238810.1016/j.camwa.2016.09.010 ↗
27. Sci. Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 11 · 32510.1166/sam.2019.3400 ↗
28. Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. · 1965 · 17 · 2410.1090/psapm/017/0197933 ↗
29. 1990