Peak divergence in the curve of magnetoelectric coefficient versus dc bias magnetic field at resonance region for bi-layer magnetostrictive/piezoelectric composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetoelectric (ME) coefficient dependence on the bias magnetic field at resonance frequencies for the bi-layered bonded Terfenol-D/Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 composite was investigated. The resonance frequency decreases first and then increases with the bias magnetic field (HDC), showing a “V” shape in the range of 0 ∼ 5 kOe. Below the resonance frequency, the pattern of ME coefficient dependence on the HDC shows a single peak, but splits into a double-peak pattern when the testing frequency increases into a certain region. With increasing the frequency, a divergent evolution of the HDC patterns was observed. Domain motion and ΔE effect combined with magnetostriction-piezoelectric coupling effect were employed to explain this experimental result.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Underwater Acoustics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology Beijing 1 Institute of Advanced Materials & Technology, , Beijing 100083, China
Zhejiang Normal University 2 Department of Physics, , Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang Province, China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1961 · 6 · 60710.1103/PhysRevLett.6.607 ↗
2. Int. J. Electron. · 1981 · 51 · 25510.1080/00207218108901330 ↗
3. Proc. SPIE · 1993 · 1919 · 22410.1117/12.148414 ↗
4. Science · 2005 · 309 · 39110.1126/science.1113357 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 02443010.1103/PhysRevB.86.024430 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 17C70310.1063/1.4793606 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 17C71010.1063/1.4795721 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 12250110.1063/1.1889237 ↗
9. Solid State Commun. · 2010 · 150 · 24810.1016/j.ssc.2009.11.017 ↗
10. Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2003 · 99 · 21110.1016/S0921-5107(02)00534-2 ↗
11. Acta. Phys. Sin. · 2006 · 55 · 376610.7498/aps.55.3766 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 608210.1103/PhysRevB.50.6082 ↗
13. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 40 · 494810.1143/JJAP.40.4948 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 10010.1063/1.1491006 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 13440210.1103/PhysRevB.65.134402 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 05290410.1063/1.2841709 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 12451110.1063/1.2943267 ↗
18. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 12540410.1088/0022-3727/41/12/125404 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 20250410.1063/1.1935040 ↗
20. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2011 · 82 · 01390310.1063/1.3529439 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 03250810.1063/1.1854736 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 481210.1063/1.1631756 ↗
23. J. Alloys Compd. · 2011 · 509 · 692010.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.184 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 511810.1063/1.1613811 ↗
25. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2011 · 323 · 280210.1016/j.jmmm.2011.06.018 ↗
26. Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 19 · 04570210.1088/0957-0233/19/4/045702 ↗
27. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2003 · 262 · L18110.1016/S0304-8853(03)00136-7 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 18442310.1103/PhysRevB.71.184423 ↗
29. Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 477610.1002/adma.200800565 ↗
30. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 12200110.1088/0022-3727/42/12/122001 ↗
31. Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 10 · 109210.1016/j.cap.2010.01.003 ↗
32. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 03500310.1088/0022-3727/41/3/035003 ↗
33. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 05390110.1063/1.1850618 ↗
34. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1992 · 28 · 220810.1109/20.179445 ↗
35. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2003 · 263 · 10110.1016/S0304-8853(02)01542-1 ↗
36. Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2006 · 43 · 161310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.085 ↗
37. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2011 · 323 · 35110.1016/j.jmmm.2010.09.040 ↗
38. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2006 · 304 · e43910.1016/j.jmmm.2006.01.210 ↗
39. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 991610.1063/1.1577404 ↗