journal article·2023-02-01Open access

Temperature dependent intrinsic Gilbert damping in magnetostrictive FeCoSiB thin film

Wenbin Hu, Lei Zhang, Lichuan Jin, Feiming Bai

AIP Advances· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

A low Gilbert damping factor is crucial for emerging magneto-acoustic devices. In current work, angle-dependent and temperature-dependent Gilbert damping of magnetostrictive FeCoSiB thin films have been investigated using electron spin resonance (ESR) and vector network analyzer ferromagnetic resonance (VNA-FMR) techniques, respectively. A very low Gilbert damping factor ∼0.0038 was measured with in-plane magnetic fields at room temperature. Temperature-dependent VNA-FMR results between 10 K and 300 K exhibit a conductivity-like damping feature, which can be attributed to the spin-orbital coupling dominantly controlled by the intraband scattering. Our results clearly indicate that highly magnetostrictive or piezomagnetic film does not necessarily have a high intrinsic damping factor.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science and Technology , Chengdu 610054, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 11410110.1063/1.4868530 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 02290110.1063/1.4958728 ↗
3. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 27810.1038/s41598-017-18441-4 ↗
4. Sci. Rep. · 2021 · 11 · 526910.1038/s41598-021-84415-2 ↗
5. Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 29610.1038/s41467-017-00343-8 ↗
6. IEEE J. Multiscale Multiphys. Comput. Tech. · 2020 · 5 · 510.1109/jmmct.2019.2959596 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2020 · 13 · 04401810.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044018 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 125 · 24200110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.242001 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2019 · 12 · 05406110.1103/physrevapplied.12.054061 ↗
10. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 755310.1038/srep07553 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 11760110.1103/physrevlett.106.117601 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2021 · 15 · 03406010.1103/physrevapplied.15.034060 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2021 · 103 · l22040310.1103/physrevb.103.l220403 ↗
14. Eur. J. Phys. · 2008 · 29 · 47510.1088/0143-0807/29/3/008 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 52 · 1345010.1103/physrevb.52.13450 ↗
16. Physical Review · 1955 · 97 · 55510.1103/physrev.97.555.2 ↗
17. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers and Short Notes and Review Papers · 2001 · 40 · 58010.1143/jjap.40.580 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 434410.1063/1.367194 ↗
19. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2022 · 55 · 24500110.1088/1361-6463/ac59fc ↗
20. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2022 · 126 · 774810.1021/acs.jpcc.2c01152 ↗
21. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2016 · 28 · 05600410.1088/0953-8984/28/5/056004 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 02720410.1103/physrevlett.99.027204 ↗
23. Surf. Sci. · 1994 · 307–309 · 110210.1016/0039-6028(94)91547-4 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 124 · 15720110.1103/physrevlett.124.157201 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 26241210.1063/1.4731273 ↗
26. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 515
27. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2289010.1038/srep22890 ↗
28. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 496 · 16590610.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165906 ↗