journal article·2018-04-01Open access

Comparison on mechanical properties of heavily phosphorus- and arsenic-doped Czochralski silicon wafers

Kang Yuan, Yuxin Sun, Yunhao Lu, Xingbo Liang, Daxi Tian, Xiangyang Ma, Deren Yang

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 4

Abstract

Heavily phosphorus (P)- and arsenic (As)-doped Czochralski silicon (CZ-Si) wafers generally act as the substrates for the epitaxial silicon wafers used to fabricate power and communication devices. The mechanical properties of such two kinds of n-type heavily doped CZ silicon wafers are vital to ensure the quality of epitaxial silicon wafers and the manufacturing yields of devices. In this work, the mechanical properties including the hardness, Young’s modulus, indentation fracture toughness and the resistance to dislocation motion have been comparatively investigated for heavily P- and As-doped CZ-Si wafers. It is found that heavily P-doped CZ-Si possesses somewhat higher hardness, lower Young’s modulus, larger indentation fracture toughness and stronger resistance to dislocation motion than heavily As-doped CZ-Si. The mechanisms underlying this finding have been tentatively elucidated by considering the differences in the doping effects of P and As in silicon.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials and School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University 1 , Hangzhou 310027, People’s Republic of China

Ningbo QL Electronics Co., Ltd 2 , Gangdong Road, Ningbo Free Trade Zone, Ningbo 315800, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1999 · 30 · 146510.1007/s11661-999-0084-y ↗
2. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2006 · 253 · 11310.1016/j.nimb.2006.10.023 ↗
3. Philos. Mag. A · 2001 · 81 · 75910.1080/01418610108212170 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 80 · 73410.1063/1.362881 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 1975 · 46 · 147010.1063/1.321797 ↗
6. Faber · 1992
7. Materials Science and Engineering R-Reports · 2013 · 74 · 110.1016/j.mser.2013.01.002 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 10710.1063/1.3436599 ↗
9. Scr. Mater. · 2001 · 45 · 126710.1016/s1359-6462(01)01160-5 ↗
10. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 124–125 · 29310.1016/j.mseb.2005.08.013 ↗
11. Hull · 1999 · 16
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 15351010.1063/1.4825222 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/physrevb.50.17953 ↗
14. Comp. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
16. Haynes · 2014-2015 · 910.1201/b17118 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Letters · 1961 · 7 · 5510.1103/physrevlett.7.55 ↗
18. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2005 · 88 · 123310.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00281.x ↗
19. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1981 · 64 · 53310.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗
20. Faber · 1992 · 90
21. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 1317910.1088/0953-8984/14/48/366 ↗
22. Faber · 1992 · 194
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 11110.1063/1.3682112 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 10510.1063/1.3120943 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1977 · 31 · 13910.1063/1.89629 ↗
26. Faber · 1992 · 176
27. Shimura · 1989 · 149