journal article·2018-03Open access

Theoretical modeling, simulation and experimental study of hybrid piezoelectric and electromagnetic energy harvester

Ping Li, Shiqiao Gao, Binglong Cong

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 3

Abstract

In this paper, performances of vibration energy harvester combined piezoelectric (PE) and electromagnetic (EM) mechanism are studied by theoretical analysis, simulation and experimental test. For the designed harvester, electromechanical coupling modeling is established, and expressions of vibration response, output voltage, current and power are derived. Then, performances of the harvester are simulated and tested; moreover, the power charging rechargeable battery is realized through designed energy storage circuit. By the results, it’s found that compared with piezoelectric-only and electromagnetic-only energy harvester, the hybrid energy harvester can enhance the output power and harvesting efficiency; furthermore, at the harmonic excitation, output power of harvester linearly increases with acceleration amplitude increasing; while it enhances with acceleration spectral density increasing at the random excitation. In addition, the bigger coupling strength, the bigger output power is, and there is the optimal load resistance to make the harvester output the maximal power.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing Research Institute of Mechanical Equipment, Beijing 100854, China

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/s1601001110.3390/s16010011 ↗
2. 10.1117/12.200875710.1117/12.2008757 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.367910210.1063/1.3679102 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00542-015-2440-810.1007/s00542-015-2440-8 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00542-013-2030-610.1007/s00542-013-2030-6 ↗
6. 10.3390/s1610172710.3390/s16101727 ↗
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/1/01502210.1088/0964-1726/19/1/015022 ↗
8. Wang P. · Journal of Semiconductors · 2012 · 10 · 1
9. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/3/03501910.1088/0964-1726/21/3/035019 ↗
10. 10.45389X1452385410.45389X14523854 ↗
11. 10.3390/s14061030610.3390/s140610306 ↗
12. 10.1109/tuffc.2010.149510.1109/tuffc.2010.1495 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.06.13610.1016/j.phpro.2011.06.136 ↗
14. 10.3390/s14071249710.3390/s140712497 ↗
15. 10.3390/s12101363610.3390/s121013636 ↗
16. James D. · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2012 · 4514
17. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/10/10401610.1088/0960-1317/18/10/104016 ↗
18. 10.1117/1.337351610.1117/1.3373516 ↗
19. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/9/09502910.1088/0964-1726/18/9/095029 ↗
20. Chen T. T. · 2014
21. Bryn E.
22. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/7/07502410.1088/0964-1726/23/7/075024 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12206-015-0928-x10.1007/s12206-015-0928-x ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/6/06501610.1088/0964-1726/23/6/065016 ↗
25. 10.1177/1045389x0809996510.1177/1045389x08099965 ↗
26. 10.1080/00150193.2013.83849010.1080/00150193.2013.838490 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.289040210.1115/1.2890402 ↗