On a relationship among optical power, current density, and junction temperature for InGaN-based light-emitting diodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Theories of spontaneous emission rates and carrier recombination mechanisms for multiple-quantum-well InGaN-based blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been carefully studied. A relationship among the optical power, the current density, and the temperature (heat-sink temperature or p-n junction temperature) is identified, and an optical-electrical-thermal model (OETM) is proposed. Thereafter, spectral measurements have been carried out to confirm the validity of this OETM. Results show that measured optical powers under various current densities and heat-sink temperatures agree satisfactorily with those determined by the OETM. Furthermore, the traditional forward-voltage method (FVM) has also been carried out for comparison. Junction temperatures determined by this OETM is in accordance with those measured by the FVM. Therefore, this model can serve as an alternative tool for fast estimating junction temperatures after relevant fitting coefficients having been determined.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xiamen University 1 Department of Electronic Science, Fujian Engineering Research Center for Solid-state Lighting, , Xiamen 361005, China
Xiamen University 2 Department of Physics, , Xiamen 361005, China
Xiamen University 3 School of Energy Research, , Xiamen 361005, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2009 · 15 · 102810.1109/JSTQE.2009.2013476 ↗
2. J. Disp. Technol. · 2007 · 3 · 16010.1109/JDT.2007.895339 ↗
3. IEEE Photon. J. · 2013 · 5 · 820011210.1109/jphot.2013.2245885 ↗
4. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. · 2015 · 27 · 84410.1109/LPT.2015.2394492 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electron. · 2014 · 61 · 78410.1109/TIE.2013.2251736 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 216310.1063/1.1795351 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2013 · 60 · 377510.1109/TED.2013.2280644 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2013 · 60 · 24110.1109/TED.2012.2228656 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 2014 · 29 · 663610.1109/TPEL.2014.2302453 ↗
10. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 2015 · 30 · 333410.1109/TPEL.2014.2336794 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 2009 · 24 · 196710.1109/TPEL.2009.2018100 ↗
12. Prog. Energ. Combust. · 2016 · 56 · 110.1016/j.pecs.2016.05.003 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2015 · 62 · 151110.1109/TED.2015.2410032 ↗
14. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2015 · 51 · 320010910.1109/JQE.2015.2410288 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 13350710.1063/1.3493654 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 03310510.1063/1.3285431 ↗
17. Opt. Express · 2008 · 16 · 2075910.1364/OE.16.020759 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 07451410.1063/1.3243319 ↗
19. IEEE Trans. Dev. Mater. Reliab. · 2011 · 11 · 30310.1109/TDMR.2010.2101600 ↗
20. 98