journal article·2015-12-01Open access

Interfacial contribution to thickness dependent in-plane anisotropic magnetoresistance

M. Tokaç, M. Wang, S. Jaiswal, A. W. Rushforth, B. L. Gallagher, D. Atkinson, A. T. Hindmarch

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 12

Abstract

We have studied in-plane anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) in cobalt films with overlayers having designed electrically interface transparency. With an electrically opaque cobalt/overlayer interface, the AMR ratio is shown to vary in inverse proportion to the cobalt film thickness; an indication that in-plane AMR is a consequence of anisotropic scattering with both volume and interfacial contributions. The interface scattering anisotropy opposes the volume scattering contribution, causing the AMR ratio to diminish as the cobalt film thickness is reduced. An intrinsic interface effect explains the significantly reduced AMR ratio in ultra-thin films.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Durham University 1 Centre for Materials Physics, , South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom

University of Nottingham 2 School of Physics & Astronomy, , Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Seventh Framework Programme

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Proc. R. Soc. London · 1857 · 8 · 54610.1098/rspl.1856.0144 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Mag. · 1975 · 11 · 101810.1109/TMAG.1975.1058782 ↗
3. Ferromagnetic materials
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 09250910.1063/1.3334720 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 21720710.1103/PhysRevLett.106.217207 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 10440110.1103/PhysRevB.90.104401 ↗
7. Physica · 1951 · 17 · 61210.1016/0031-8914(51)90117-6 ↗
8. Progr. Theor. Phys. · 1962 · 27 · 77210.1143/PTP.27.772 ↗
9. Physica · 1964 · 30 · 114110.1016/0031-8914(64)90105-3 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 11720310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.117203 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 22660210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.226602 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 08720410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.087204 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 07720110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.077201 ↗
14. Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 34710.1038/nmat2983 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 20660110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.206601 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 22040910.1103/PhysRevB.87.220409 ↗
17. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. · 1938 · 34 · 10010.1017/S0305004100019952 ↗
18. Philos. Mag. Suppl · 1952 · 1 · 1
19. L. K. Bogart, Ph.D. thesis, Durham University (2010).
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 17C71410.1063/1.4795799 ↗
21. J. Phys. C · 1984 · 17 · 603910.1088/0022-3719/17/33/015 ↗
22. Bychkov · JETP Lett. · 1984 · 39 · 78
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 13440510.1103/PhysRevB.80.134405 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17C70310.1063/1.4855935 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 115 · 08990110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.089901 ↗
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 88 · 414010.1063/1.1310189 ↗
28. J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 519710.1063/1.364464 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 1295710.1103/PhysRevB.60.12957 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 247910.1063/1.372206 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 65 · 02040510.1103/PhysRevB.65.020405 ↗
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 823010.1063/1.1558638 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 212404(B)10.1103/PhysRevB.83.212404 ↗
34. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 156 · 6710.1016/0304-8853(95)00789-X ↗
35. J. Phys. Rad. · 1954 · 15 · 37610.1051/jphysrad:01954001505037601 ↗
36. Rep. Progr. Phys. · 1996 · 59 · 140910.1088/0034-4885/59/11/002 ↗
37. Adv. Phys. · 2005 · 54 · 13710.1080/00018730500112000 ↗
38. Spin · 2011 · 1 · 4510.1142/S2010324711000069 ↗
39. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 05441710.1103/PhysRevB.88.054417 ↗