journal article·2013-06-01Open access

Resonant magnetoelectric response of cantilevers with magnetostrictive and piezoelectric layers on opposite sides of the substrate

Matthias C. Krantz, Jascha L. Gugat, Martina Gerken

AIP Advances· Volume 3· Issue 6

Abstract

A theory is derived for the bending-mode magnetoelectric coefficients at resonance for magnetostrictive and piezoelectric layers on opposite sides of a substrate. Results are given for the transverse ME coefficient in the Metglas-Si-AlN system with magnetic field excitation parallel and electric polarization perpendicular to the cantilever. The center-substrate layer sequence is found to produce about 50 % enhancement of the magnetoelectric effect compared to magnetoelectric bilayers on one side of a substrate. Up to about 10 % additional enhancement of the ME effect is predicted if the magnetostrictive and piezoelectric layers are separated from the substrate by spacer layers with lower Youngs modulus. Lowest order bending mode resonance frequencies are given.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Christian-Albrechts-Universitaet zu Kiel Institute of Electrical and Information Engineering, , Germany

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · 2005 · 38 · R12310.1088/0022-3727/38/8/R01 ↗
2. Journal of Applied Physics · 2008 · 103 · 03110110.1063/1.2836410 ↗
3. Applied Physics Letters · 2010 · 96 · 18250110.1063/1.3377908 ↗
4. Applied Physics Letters · 2010 · 97 · 15250310.1063/1.3497277 ↗
5. Applied Physics Letters · 2009 · 94 · 24350710.1063/1.3157281 ↗
6. J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2012 · 22 · 06502410.1088/0960-1317/22/6/065024 ↗
7. Physical Review B · 2001 · 64 · 110.1103/PhysRevB.64.214408 ↗
8. Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 110.1103/PhysRevB.65.134402 ↗
9. Physical Review B · 1980 · 21 · 292610.1103/PhysRevB.21.2926 ↗
10. Physical Review B · 2003 · 68 · 1
11. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mat. · 1993 · 4 · 161
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 22440710.1103/PhysRevB.75.224407 ↗
13. Applied Physics Letters · 2005 · 86 · 20250410.1063/1.1935040 ↗
14. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2009 · 56 · 257810.1109/TUFFC.2009.1346 ↗
15. Journal of Applied Physics · 2012 · 112 · 04430310.1063/1.4745892 ↗
16. Microsyst. Technol · 2012 · 18 · 78710.1007/s00542-012-1493-1 ↗
17. AIP Advances · 2013 · 3 · 02210310.1063/1.4790630 ↗
18. Physical Review B · 2003 · 68 · 13240810.1103/PhysRevB.68.132408 ↗
19. Journal of Applied Physics · 2009 · 105 · 06391110.1063/1.3087766 ↗
20. Applied Physics Letters · 2013 · 102 · 01160110.1063/1.4773358 ↗
21. Physical Review B · 1996 · 53 · 1631010.1103/PhysRevB.53.16310 ↗
22. Fournal De Physique · 1988 · C8 · 1709
23. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2004 · 22 · 36110.1116/1.1649343 ↗
24. Composite Structures · 2009 · 87 · 20610.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.006 ↗
25. 1997
26. J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2003 · 13 · 83210.1088/0960-1317/13/6/306 ↗