Analysis of carrier recombination coefficients of 3C- and 6H-SiC: Insights into recombination mechanisms in stacking faults of 4H-SiC
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, 4H-SiC power devices have been widely employed in power electronic systems owing to their superior performance to Si power devices. However, stacking faults in 4H-SiC can degrade the device performance. Stacking faults can be considered as polytype inclusions in 4H-SiC. Carrier recombination in stacking faults is considered a cause for performance degradation. Understanding carrier recombination in different polytypes other than 4H-SiC can be helpful in understanding the mechanism of performance degradation due to stacking faults in 4H-SiC. Therefore, in this study, we characterized the recombination coefficients of 3C- and 6H-SiC and compared them with those of 4H-SiC using the time-resolved free-carrier absorption measurement method. Recombination at the stacking faults in 4H-SiC cannot be considered as the intrinsic recombination of inclusions of other polytypes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression · HVDC Systems and Fault Protection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology , Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Express · 2022 · 15 · 04550210.35848/1882-0786/ac5c01 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2023 · 70 · 175710.1109/ted.2023.3246023 ↗
3. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 54 · 04010310.7567/jjap.54.040103 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1999 · 46 · 47110.1109/16.748864 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 124 · 09570210.1063/1.5042561 ↗
6. Phys. Rep. · 2003 · 379 · 14910.1016/s0370-1573(02)00632-4 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 71 · 326910.1063/1.120309 ↗
8. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 21 · 95210.1088/0268-1242/21/7/021 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 02370510.1063/1.3459894 ↗
10. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 26530410.1088/0022-3727/46/26/265304 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 11510110.1063/1.4962717 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 24211010.1063/1.3273382 ↗
13. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2023 · 62 · SC101710.35848/1347-4065/acaca8 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 128 · 10570210.1063/5.0015199 ↗
15. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2020 · 91 · 12390210.1063/5.0018080 ↗
16. Mater. Sci. Forum · 2018 · 924 · 26910.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.924.269 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 27510.1063/1.368024 ↗
18. Mater. Lett. · 2019 · 254 · 9610.1016/j.matlet.2019.07.043 ↗
19. Mater. Sci. Forum · 2018 · 924 · 43210.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.924.432 ↗
20. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 53 · 10800310.7567/jjap.53.108003 ↗
21. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 44 · 36540210.1088/0022-3727/44/36/365402 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 247310.1063/1.1432476 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 82 · 549610.1063/1.365578 ↗
24. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 21 · R1710.1088/0268-1242/21/6/r01 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 123 · 16156010.1063/1.5003385 ↗