Fast equilibrium reconstruction by deep learning on EAST tokamak
Source abstract
Abstract
A deep neural network is developed and trained on magnetic measurements (input) and EFIT poloidal magnetic flux (output) on the EAST tokamak. In optimizing the network architecture, we use automatic optimization to search for the best hyperparameters, which helps in better model generalization. We compare the inner magnetic surfaces and last-closed-flux surfaces with those from EFIT. We also calculated the normalized internal inductance, which is completely determined by the poloidal magnetic flux and can further reflect the accuracy of the prediction. The time evolution of the internal inductance in full discharge is compared with that provided by EFIT. All of the comparisons show good agreement, demonstrating the accuracy of the machine learning model, which has high spatial resolution compared with the off-line EFIT while still meeting the time constraint of real-time control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China 1 , Hefei 230026, China
Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Hefei 230031, China
Funding
Comprehensive Research Facility for Fusion Technology of China · Users With Excellence Program of Hefei Science Center CAS · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Nucl. Fusion · 1985 · 25 · 161110.1088/0029-5515/25/11/007 ↗
2. Nucl. Fusion · 1990 · 30 · 103510.1088/0029-5515/30/6/006 ↗
3. Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 48 · 96810.13182/fst48-968 ↗
4. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 11 · 14210.1088/1009-0630/11/2/03 ↗
5. Nucl. Fusion · 1992 · 32 · 135110.1088/0029-5515/32/8/I05 ↗
6. Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 05300110.1088/0029-5515/51/5/053001 ↗
7. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 60 · 01603410.1088/1741-4326/ab555f ↗
8. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2022 · 64 · 07400110.1088/1361-6587/ac6fff ↗
9. Nucl. Fusion · 2017 · 57 · 10201910.1088/1741-4326/aa7861 ↗
10. Kinetic equilibrium reconstruction for the NBI- and ICRH-heated H-mode plasma on EAST tokamak10.1088/2058-6272/aab262 ↗
11. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 12500810.1088/0741-3335/55/12/125008 ↗
12. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 12 · 41210.1088/1009-0630/12/4/06 ↗
13. Nucl. Fusion · 2023 · 63 · 05601910.1088/1741-4326/acbfcc ↗
14. T. Akiba , S.Sano, T.Yanase, T.Ohta, and M.Koyama, arXiv:1907.10902 (2019).
15. Nature · 1986 · 323 · 53310.1038/323533a0 ↗
16. 2015
17. F. Chollet , Keras, https://keras.io, 2015.
18. M. Abadi , A.Agarwal, P.Barham, E.Brevdo, Z.Chen, C.Citro, G. S.Corrado, A.Davis, J.Dean, M.Devin, S.Ghemawat, I.Goodfellow, A.Harp, G.Irving, M.Isard, Y.Jia, R.Jozefowicz, L.Kaiser, M.Kudlur, J.Levenberg, D.Mané, R.Monga, S.Moore, D.Murray, C.Olah, M.Schuster, J.Shlens, B.Steiner, I.Sutskever, K.Talwar, P.Tucker, V.Vanhoucke, V.Vasudevan, F.Viégas, O.Vinyals, P.Warden, M.Wattenberg, M.Wicke, Y.Yu, and X.Zheng, TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, 2015, Software available from tensorflow.org.