journal article·2019-06-01Open access

Shock wave in a long-air-gap leader discharge

Yingzhe Cui, Chijie Zhuang, Rong Zeng, Xuan Zhou

AIP Advances· Volume 9· Issue 6

Abstract

We report the shock wave phenomenon in an air-gap leader discharge observed using an interferometer. The continuous temporal evolution of the shock wave and plasma channel is recorded and reproduced with a thermohydrodynamic model based on the measured current, providing a prediction of the pressure pulses of the shock wave. The weak shock wave propagates at nearly the speed of sound, and the simulation results for the shock wave front positions and the plasma channel radius are consistent with experimental measurements. Experimental observations and numerical comparisons show that continuous energy injection results in a temporary overpressure process in the plasma channel and generates the shock wave. The pressure at the shock front falls rapidly and decays with propagation of the wave. In the weak shock region, the pressure wave decays as P∝R−3/4. The wave propagation predicted using the thermohydrodynamic model is compared with propagations predicted using the Vlases and Jones models, and we find that a measurement of the shock wave propagation trajectory gives an estimate of the energy injected to the leader channel during a discharge.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Geophys. Res. Lett. · 2017 · 44 · 1117410.1002/2017gl075262 ↗
2. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 21 · 05100110.1088/2058-6272/aafdfa ↗
3. Geophys. Res. Lett. · 2017 · 44 · 802710.1002/2017gl074610 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111 · 22410110.1063/1.5010714 ↗
5. Electr. Power Syst. Res. · 2019 · 172 · 3210.1016/j.epsr.2019.02.024 ↗
6. Electr. Power Syst. Res. · 2018 · 159 · 1710.1016/j.epsr.2017.08.021 ↗
7. Les Renardières Group · Electra · 1972 · 23 · 53
8. Phys. Rep. · 2014 · 534 · 14710.1016/j.physrep.2013.09.004 ↗
9. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 21 · 161310.1088/0022-3727/21/11/011 ↗
10. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 48520610.1088/1361-6463/aa9266 ↗
11. Phys. Plasmas. · 2014 · 21 · 04311110.1063/1.4873701 ↗
12. Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 11270310.1063/1.3023156 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 12410410.1063/1.4798827 ↗
14. Phys. Plasmas. · 2012 · 19 · 08350410.1063/1.4745867 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 01330310.1063/1.2952540 ↗
16. IEEE. Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2019 · 47 · 191710.1109/tps.2018.2882231 ↗
17. J. Phys. Colloq. · 1979 · 40 · 19310.1051/jphyscol:19797440 ↗
18. Plasma Phys. Rep. · 1998 · 24 · 541
19. Plasma Phys. Rep. · 2003 · 29 · 69510.1134/1.1601648 ↗
20. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. · 2013 · 118 · 1310.1002/2013jd020618 ↗
21. Electr. Power Syst. Res. · 2016 · 139 · 1610.1016/j.epsr.2015.11.028 ↗
22. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 34520210.1088/1361-6463/aa7c71 ↗
23. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 51 · 03520210.1088/1361-6463/aa9fa6 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 125 · 11330210.1063/1.5085852 ↗
25. Phys. Fluids · 1966 · 9 · 47810.1063/1.1761701 ↗
26. J. Geophys. Res. · 1968 · 73 · 312110.1029/jb073i010p03121 ↗
27. Phys. Plasmas. · 2015 · 22 · 06350810.1063/1.4922660 ↗
28. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1971 · 42 · 376610.1063/1.1659684 ↗
29. J. Appl. Phys. · 1975 · 46 · 200510.1063/1.321882 ↗
30. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 10351310.1063/1.5055256 ↗
31. Phys. Plasmas. · 2011 · 18 · 06350910.1063/1.3601764 ↗
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 121 · 11330310.1063/1.4978745 ↗
33. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 38 · 388910.1088/0022-3727/38/21/009 ↗
34. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. · 1952 · 5 · 30110.1002/cpa.3160050305 ↗
35. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1946 · 18 · 9710.1121/1.1916347 ↗