journal article·2021-02-01Open access

Solution of two-electron Schrödinger equations using a residual minimization method and one-dimensional basis functions

Faiz Ur Rahman, Yanoar Pribadi Sarwono, Rui-Qin Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 2

Abstract

Distinctive from conventional electronic structure methods, we solve the Schrödinger wave equations of the helium atom and its isoelectronic ions by employing one-dimensional basis functions to separate components. We use full two-electron six-dimensional operators and wavefunctions represented with real-space grids where the refinement of the latter is carried out using a residual minimization method. In contrast to the standard single-electron approach, the current approach results in exact treatment of repulsion energy and, hence, more accurate electron correlation within five centihartrees or better included, with moderate computational cost. A simple numerical convergence between the error to accurate results and the grid-spacing size is found. The obtained two-electron Schrödinger wavefunction that contains vast and elaborating information for the radial correlation function and common one-dimensional functions shows the electron correlation effect on one-electron distributions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Atomic and Molecular Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, City University of Hong Kong 1 , Hong Kong, China

Beijing Computational Science Research Center 2 , Beijing 100193, China

Funding

NSAF Joint Fund

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 136 · B86410.1103/physrev.136.b864 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 140 · A113310.1103/physrev.140.a1133 ↗
3. 1928 · 89
4. Z. Phys. · 1930 · 61 · 12610.1007/bf01340294 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 427410.1103/physrevb.13.4274 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 78510.1103/physrevb.37.785 ↗
7. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1989 · 61 · 68910.1103/revmodphys.61.689 ↗
8. Z. Phys. · 1929 · 54 · 34710.1007/bf01375457 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. · 1958 · 112 · 164910.1103/physrev.112.1649 ↗
10. 2008 · 33
11. Phys. Rev. A · 1993 · 47 · 7110.1103/physreva.47.71 ↗
12. J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 127 · 22410410.1063/1.2801981 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. A · 2000 · 61 · 06450310.1103/physreva.61.064503 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. A · 2002 · 65 · 05450110.1103/physreva.65.054501 ↗
15. Int. J. Quantum Chem. · 2018 · 118 · e2569410.1002/qua.25694 ↗
16. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. · 2019
17. J. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 148 · 10410110.1063/1.5017621 ↗
18. New J. Phys. · 2020 · 22 · 09305910.1088/1367-2630/abb47e ↗
19. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. · 1985 · 18 · 134310.1088/0305-4470/18/9/018 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
21. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2007 · 177 · 95110.1016/j.cpc.2007.08.004 ↗
22. J. Comput. Phys. · 1982 · 45 · 10010.1016/0021-9991(82)90104-8 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 25300210.1103/physrevlett.101.253002 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. A · 2001 · 63 · 04211310.1103/physreva.63.042113 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 103910.1103/physrevlett.76.1039 ↗
26. Phys. Lett. A · 1994 · 195 · 21310.1016/0375-9601(94)90155-4 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. A · 1970 · 2 · 4910.1103/physreva.2.49 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. E · 2014 · 89 · 05331910.1103/physreve.89.053319 ↗
29. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1979 · 16 · 15910.1016/0010-4655(79)90084-5 ↗
30. Adv. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 114 · 26310.1002/9780470141731.ch4 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1135510.1103/physrevb.50.11355 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 03510910.1103/physrevb.71.035109 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 19310110.1103/physrevb.64.193101 ↗
34. 2004
35. Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1976 · 44 · 36310.1016/0009-2614(76)80531-3 ↗
36. Proc. Phys. Soc. · 1965 · 85 · 64710.1088/0370-1328/85/4/303 ↗
37. Proc. Phys. Soc. · 1961 · 78 · 83110.1088/0370-1328/78/5/328 ↗