journal article·2021-01-01Open access

Separate quantitative evaluation of degree of order and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy for disorder and order portion in FePt granular films

Takashi Saito, Kim Kong Tham, Ryosuke Kushibiki, Tomoyuki Ogawa, Shin Saito

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

The dependence of the degree of order and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (Ku⊥) on magnetic layer thickness (dmag) for FePt granular films with various grain boundary materials (GBMs) were investigated. According to the analysis for granular films with a constant GBM volume of 30 vol%, the order, disorder, and non-epitaxial portions co-existed in the FePt granular films. From the separate quantitative evaluation for these portions, the following was found; 1) the degree of order and magnitudes of Ku⊥ for disorder and order portions against dmag were constant, while the film average evaluation resulted in the dependence of the degree of order and Ku⊥ on dmag and the positive correlation between the grain diameter and the degree of order, 2) for the order portion, Ku⊥ had linear correlation with the degree of order, 3) the magnitude of Ku⊥ and the degree of order for the order portion depended on GBM.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties of Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electronic Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University 1 , Sendai 980-8579, Japan

Research Assistant, Graduate Program in Spintronics (GP-Spin), Tohoku University 2 , Sendai 980-8578, Japan

Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K. K. 3 , Tsukuba 300-4247, Japan

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan · Advanced Storage Research Consortium

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 568610.1063/1.368831 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 333210.1063/1.1621071 ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07E14310.1063/1.2835089 ↗
4. Phys. Status Solidi A · 2013 · 210 · 124510.1002/pssa.201329106 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 310010810.1109/tmag.2013.2281027 ↗
6. Scripta Materialia · 2017 · 135 · 8810.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.035 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 320090410.1109/tmag.2015.2435027 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 11530110.1063/1.4943936 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 301710.1109/tmag.2006.878402 ↗
10. Eur. Phys. J. B · 2013 · 86 · 8110.1140/epjb/e2012-30655-3 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 02240210.1063/1.4973473 ↗
12. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2010 · 322 · 265810.1016/j.jmmm.2010.04.003 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2019 · 55 · 320020810.1109/tmag.2019.2906254 ↗
14. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 41 · 218910.1143/jjap.41.2189 ↗
15. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 59 · 04550110.35848/1347-4065/ab7adc ↗
16. 10.1109/TMAG.2020.301551510.1109/TMAG.2020.3015515 ↗
17. Materials Science Forum · 1999 · 302-303 · 40110.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.302-303.401 ↗
18. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1987 · 23 · 242810.1109/tmag.1987.1065331 ↗
19. 2009
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 269010.1063/1.1643187 ↗