Improved linewidth enhancement factor of 1.3-µm InAs/GaAs quantum dot lasers by direct Si doping
Source abstract
Abstract
We report on the significantly improved linewidth enhancement factor (αH-factor) of 1.3-µm InAs/GaAs quantum dot (QD) lasers by direct Si doping, compared with ones having identical structures but without the Si doping. It is found that the αH-factors for the ground-state and first excited-state at their gain peak positions of the Si-doped QD lasers are 1.48 and 0.63 while those of the undoped QD lasers are 2.07 and 1.07, greatly decreasing by about 28.5% and 41.1%, respectively. Furthermore, theoretical calculation and analysis suggest that direct Si doping would increase the electron quasi-Fermi level in conduction, leading to the increase in population inversion. Meanwhile, the appearance of a built-in electric field caused by the Si doping would accelerate the capture of electrons into QDs and strengthen the confinement effect of electrons, resulting in an increased differential gain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 , Beijing 100083, China
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Beijing 100049, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Zhijiang Lab
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1987 · 23 · 910.1109/jqe.1987.1073204 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 112 · 25111110.1063/1.5025879 ↗
3. Electron. Lett. · 1984 · 20 · 103810.1049/el:19840709 ↗
4. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 1997 · 3 · 19610.1109/2944.605656 ↗
5. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2008 · 44 · 94610.1109/jqe.2008.2003106 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1988 · 52 · 194510.1063/1.99584 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 01310110.1063/1.2405738 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 24111710.1063/1.4904831 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 113 · 06110510.1063/1.5040792 ↗
10. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2019 · 25 · 110.1109/jstqe.2019.2916884 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 06352410.1063/1.3483252 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 10351110.1063/1.3660794 ↗
13. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2013 · 113 · 14410.1016/j.solmat.2013.02.005 ↗
14. Nano Energy · 2014 · 6 · 15910.1016/j.nanoen.2014.03.016 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 113 · 01110510.1063/1.5026809 ↗
16. 2018 · 2759
17. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 04520210.1063/1.5141160 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 445710.1063/1.329371 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 1973 · 44 · 411310.1063/1.1662905 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 1975 · 46 · 129910.1063/1.321696 ↗
21. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2013 · 25 · 48810.1109/lpt.2013.2243136 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1993 · 62 · 159110.1063/1.108647 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 110.1063/1.1638628 ↗
24. Opt. Lett. · 2012 · 37 · 129810.1364/ol.37.001298 ↗
25. Electron. Lett. · 2004 · 40 · 42810.1049/el:20040270 ↗
26. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2006 · 42 · 94210.1109/jqe.2006.880380 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 05390210.1063/1.4907348 ↗
28. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2002 · 38 · 158710.1109/jqe.2002.805246 ↗