Tungsten divertor plasma simulation with bundled charge state model by SOLPS-ITER on EAST
Source abstract
Abstract
Research was originally carried out to evaluate plasma performance with a tungsten (W) divertor on EAST using the bundled charge state model by the coupled multi-fluid plasma and kinetic neutral code SOLPS-ITER. This work focuses on the comparisons of several bundled charge state models of W and the all W ion model in low and high recycling divertor operational regimes. It is found that bundled charge state models have a pronounced effect on the reduction of computational time and computer memory and provide an improved marked code speed by a factor of more than five. In the low recycling regime, compared to the full W charge state model, the differences in the plasma parameters at both divertor targets are within 15% for different bundling schemes. In the high recycling regime, no significant difference between bundled charge state models and the all charge state model is observed due to the very low W concentration (∼10−6). It, therefore, indicates that bundled charge state models of W can describe divertor parameters well to a considerable degree. Besides, the errors of tungsten concentration (CW) and the effective ion charge number (Zeff) at the outer mid-plane for bundled models are within 40% inside the separatrix. At the same time, highly resolved bundled models with more than 20 W fluids can describe the radiation power loss consistently within 50% as compared with the all charge state model, while it varies greatly from one aggressively bundled model to the other, especially for core radiation, which is strongly related to the bundling schemes for relatively high charge states.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 , Hefei 230031, China
University of Science and Technology of China 2 , Hefei 230026, China
Advanced Energy Research Center, Shenzhen University 3 , Shenzhen 518060, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Nature Science Foundation
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 2000
2. ITER Physics Expert Group on Divertor, ITER Physics Expert Group on Divertor Modelling, and Database and ITER Physics Basis Editors · Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 239110.1088/0029-5515/39/12/304 ↗
3. 2013 · 1
4. J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266-269 · 20710.1016/s0022-3115(98)00890-3 ↗
5. Phys. Scr. · 2011 · T145 · 01400110.1088/0031-8949/2011/t145/014001 ↗
6. Nucl. Mater. Energy · 2019 · 20 · 10069610.1016/j.nme.2019.100696 ↗
7. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 12404110.1088/0741-3335/55/12/124041 ↗
8. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 11201010.1088/1741-4326/ab0e27 ↗
9. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 48010.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.012 ↗
10. Nucl. Mater. Energy · 2020 · 25 · 10078410.1016/j.nme.2020.100784 ↗
11. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S48810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.041 ↗
12. Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 47 · 17210.13182/fst47-172 ↗
13. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2016 · 11 · 140310210.1585/pfr.11.1403102 ↗
14. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 04601910.1088/1741-4326/ab73c1 ↗
15. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 12250910.1063/1.4997101 ↗
16. J. Nucl. Mater. · 1981 · 103 · 33310.1016/0022-3115(82)90619-5 ↗
17. Phys. Plasmas · 2020 · 27 · 08250710.1063/5.0006607 ↗
18. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2014 · 56 · 02500310.1088/0741-3335/56/2/025003 ↗
19. Fusion Eng. Des. · 2015 · 94 · 6710.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.03.022 ↗
20. Tungsten · 2019 · 1 · 12210.1007/s42864-019-00019-4 ↗
21. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 09251210.1063/1.4991457 ↗
22. H. P. Summers, The ADAS User Manual, version 2.6, URL: http://www.adas.ac.uk/.