journal article·2020-09-01Open access

Lightweight protective configurations against blast and fragments impact: Experimental and numerical studies

Khurshid Ahmed, Abdul Qadeer Malik, Arshad Hussain, Iram Raza Ahmad, Iftikhar Ahmad

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 9

Abstract

Lightweight protective configurations against blast and fragment impacts were studied experimentally and numerically. The configurations comprised different combinations of Kevlar fabrics, laminated GFRP (Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester), polyurethane (PU) foam, and alumina (Al2O3). The polyurethane (PU)–sand multi-layer composition and a mixture of polyurethane–sand and polyurethane–alumina powder were also studied. The protective configurations were tested under static detonation of a scaled down artillery shell. Protective capabilities were tested against a peak incident overpressure of 57 psi and fragments weighing up to 4.3 g carrying velocities in the range of 961 m/s–1555 m/s. Numerical simulations were performed using ANSYS AUTODYN. The coupled SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics)–ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian) approach was used to simulate the interaction of fragments with protective configurations. A coupled Euler–ALE approach was employed for blast wave loading on protective configurations. The Kevlar fabrics, laminated GFRP, and PU foam compositions provided significant absorption and attenuation to impacting fragments. Configurations employing alumina tile were able to withstand both blast and fragment impacts without significant backface signatures (blunt force trauma). The configurations can be employed as body armor, vehicle armor, and for the safety and security of other critical infrastructures against blast wave and high velocity fragment impact. Numerical simulation results are in fair agreement with experimental results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical & Materials Engineering (SCME), National University of Sciences and Technology , Islamabad PC 44000, Pakistan

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. A numerical investigation on explosive fragmentation of metal casing using smoothed particle hydrodynamic method10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.041 ↗
2. Innovative technologies for controlled fragmentation warheads10.1115/1.4023341 ↗
3. Fragmentation of shell cases10.1098/rspa.1947.0042 ↗
4. FEM simulation of HE blast-fragmentation warhead and the calculation of lethal range
5. 1943
6. Influencing parameters on HE projectiles with natural fragmentation
7. Axial distribution of fragment velocities from cylindrical casing under explosive loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.007 ↗
8. Primary blast injury: An intact tympanic membrane does not indicate the lack of a pulmonary blast injury10.7205/milmed-d-10-00300 ↗
9. Pressure versus impulse graph for blast-induced traumatic brain injury and correlation to observable blast injuries
10. Shock wave overpresure evaluation at blast detonation inside a destructible container
11. 1977
12. A computational investigation of various water-induced explosion mitigation mechanisms10.1163/157361107780744405 ↗
13. Impact mechanics and high-energy absorbing materials: Review10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2008)21:4(235) ↗
14. The ballistic impact characteristics of Kevlar® woven fabrics impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid10.1023/a:1024424200221 ↗
15. Numerical study on the ballistic impact response of aramid fabric-epoxy laminated composites by armor piercing projectile10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.002 ↗
16. 2008
17. 2009 · 5000
18. A computational analysis of the ballistic performance of light-weight hybrid composite armors10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.01.016 ↗
19. Lightweight projectile resistant armor system
20. Ballistic protection of military shelters from mortar fragmentation and blast effects using a multi-layer structure10.14429/dsj.69.13269 ↗
21. Experimental study on the dynamic responses of foam sandwich panels with different facesheets and core gradients subjected to blast impulse10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103327 ↗
22. Dynamic response of laminated GFRP composite under low velocity impact: Experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.052 ↗
23. Numerical analysis for critical structures protection against blast loading using metallic panels10.3390/app10062121 ↗
24. A laboratory experimental technique for simulating combined blast and impact loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103382 ↗
25. Simulation and experimental tests of ballistic impact on composite laminate armor10.1155/2018/4696143 ↗
26. High velocity impact response of Kevlar-29/epoxy and 6061-T6 aluminum laminated panels10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.034 ↗
27. Mechanics of penetration and perforation10.1016/0020-7225(78)90066-6 ↗
28. 2004 · 394
29. E. Lozano, “Design and analysis of a personnel blast shield for different explosives applications,” MSc Thesis (Colorado School of Mines, Arthur Lakes Library, 2016).
30. 2017
31. Heterogeneous lightweight configuration for protection against 7.62 × 39 mm bullet impact10.1177/2041419619839216 ↗
32. Fragmentation analysis of OG-7 warhead using AUTODYN SPH solver10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.576.645 ↗
33. Adiabatic expansion of high explosive detonation products
34. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures
35. An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials10.1063/1.46199 ↗
36. 2006
37. SPH and ALE formulations for fluid structure coupling
38. Experimental studies on blast mitigation capabilities of conventional dry aqueous foam10.1063/5.0010283 ↗
39. 2001
40. Understanding blunt force trauma/backface signature