Damping constant measurement and inverse giant magnetoresistance in spintronic devices with Fe4N
Source abstract
Abstract
Fe4N is one of the attractive materials for spintronic devices due to its large spin asymmetric conductance and negative spin polarization at the Fermi level. We have successfully deposited Fe4N thin film with (001) out-of-plane orientation using a DC facing-target-sputtering system. A Fe(001)/Ag(001) composite buffer layer is selected to improve the (001) orientation of the Fe4N thin film. The N2 partial pressure during sputtering is optimized to promote the formation of Fe4N phase. Moreover, we have measured the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) of the (001) oriented Fe4N thin film using coplanar waveguides and microwave excitation. The resonant fields are tested under different microwave excitation frequencies, and the experimental results match well with the Kittel formula. The Gilbert damping constant of Fe4N is determined to be α = 0.021±0.02. We have also fabricated and characterized the current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) giant magnetoresistance (GMR) device with Fe4N/Ag/Fe sandwich. Inverse giant magnetoresistance is observed in the CPP GMR device, which suggests that the spin polarization of Fe4N and Fe4N/Ag interface is negative.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota 1 , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota 2 , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
Funding
National Science Foundation · DOD | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · SRC | Microelectronics Advanced Research Corporation
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Express · 2010 · 3 · 10300210.1143/apex.3.103002 ↗
2. Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 638710.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.016 ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07E12610.1063/1.3556919 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 17241010.1103/physrevb.73.172410 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 20250210.1063/1.3140459 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 01391710.1063/1.2753576 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07C92810.1063/1.3072827 ↗
8. Japanese J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 51 · 06800110.7567/jjap.51.068001 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Express · 2009 · 2 · 08300110.1143/apex.2.083001 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Express · 2010 · 3 · 11300310.1143/apex.3.113003 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 01391110.1063/1.4733327 ↗
12. IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. · 2014 · 9 · S7310.1002/tee.22040 ↗
13. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 06300410.7567/apex.6.063004 ↗
15. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 52 · 07300110.7567/jjap.52.073001 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 01442010.1103/physrevb.90.014420 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 25240910.1063/1.4853195 ↗
18. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 237210.1109/tmag.2006.878813 ↗
19. Eur. Phys. J. B · 2007 · 59 · 47510.1140/epjb/e2007-00071-1 ↗