Anisotropic ferromagnetic polymer: A first step for their implementation in microfluidic systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Here we report on the influence of anisotropic microstructure on the performances of magnetically soft micro-patterns intended to integrate microfluidic systems. These micro-patterns are made of a composite obtained by mixing carbonyl iron particles with polydimethylsiloxane, which offers practical integration advantages. We investigated a wide range of magnetic particle loadings, from 10wt% to 83wt%, reaching magnetization as high as 630 kA/m. A homogeneous field was applied during the polymer’s cross-linking phase so that to obtain a 1D arrangement of the particles in the solidified polymer, along the field direction. Here we present the results obtained for square-based micro-pillars prepared under a magnetic field applied along one of its diagonal. We assessed the magnetic anisotropy owing to the particles’ spatial arrangement by comparing the magnetization processes along the two diagonals of the micro-pillar’s base. The magnetic susceptibilities along the two directions differ from a factor greater than three. The results can be described in terms of high aspect ratio and porous magnetic agglomerates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CNRS 1 Institut Lumière Matière ILM-UMR 5306, , Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne F-69622, France
CNRS 2 Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon INL-UMR5270, , Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne F-69622, France
CNRS 3 Laboratoire Multimatériaux et Interfaces LMI-UMR 5615, , Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne F-69622, France
Funding
Institut Carnot Ingenierie@Lyon · University of Lyon 1
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Lab Chip · 2006 · 6 · 2410.1039/B513005K ↗
2. Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 514710.1021/la104400m ↗
3. Biomed Microdev. · 2010 · 12 · 63710.1007/s10544-010-9416-3 ↗
4. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. · 2013 · 41 · 12910.1016/j.bios.2012.08.007 ↗
5. J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2009 · 19 · 10501910.1088/0960-1317/19/10/105019 ↗
6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 59010.1016/j.jmmm.2008.09.028 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 26240110.1063/1.4886375 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 10251110.1063/1.3341190 ↗
9. Biomicrofluidics · 2014 · 8 · 05410310.1063/1.4894497 ↗
10. Nature Methods · 2012 · 9 · 111310.1038/nmeth.2210 ↗
11. Nature Communications · 2013 · 4 · 282110.1038/ncomms3821 ↗
12. Electrophoresis · 2007 · 28 · 471310.1002/elps.200700212 ↗
13. J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2011 · 21 · 09501310.1088/0960-1317/21/9/095013 ↗
14. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 338010.1021/jp031148i ↗
15. ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 187310.1021/nn901597a ↗
16. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. · 2001 · 2310.1590/S0100-73862001000100001 ↗
17. Fuel Cells · 2014 · 14 · 25910.1002/fuce.201300186 ↗
18. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 453510.1021/am500335u ↗
19. Phil. Mag. · 2006 · 86 · 245110.1080/14786430600617161 ↗