Changes in magnetic domain structure during twin boundary motion in single crystal Ni-Mn-Ga exhibiting magnetic shape memory effect
Source abstract
Abstract
The complexity of Ni-Mn-Ga single crystal originates from the interplay between ferromagnetic domain structure and ferroelastic twinned microstructure. Magnetic domain structure in the vicinity of single twin boundary was studied using magneto-optical indicator film and magnetic force microscopy technique. The single twin boundary of Type I was formed mechanically and an initial magnetization state in both variants were restored by local application of magnetic field (≈40 kA/m). The differently oriented variants exhibited either stripe or labyrinth magnetic domain pattern in agreement with the uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the martensite. The twin boundary was then moved by compressive or tensile stress. The passage of the boundary resulted in the formation of granular or rake domains, respectively. Additionally, the specific magnetic domains pattern projected by twin boundary gradually vanished during twin boundary motion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics ASCR Department of Functional Materials, , Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 21 Prague 8, Czech Republic
Funding
Czech Scientific Foundation · Prague Competetiveness
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 02190210.1063/1.4775677 ↗
2. 2009 · 399
3. Olson · 1992 · 97
4. 2003
5. Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 745010.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.020 ↗
6. Mater. Sci. Tech. Ser. · 2014 · 30 · 155910.1179/1743284714Y.0000000599 ↗
7. Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 62210.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.007 ↗
8. J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2014 · 64 · 19810.1016/j.jmps.2013.11.004 ↗
9. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 12410310.1063/1.3640489 ↗
11. J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2013 · 61 · 72610.1016/j.jmps.2012.11.004 ↗
12. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2001 · 226 · 99610.1016/S0304-8853(00)01170-7 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 02250710.1063/1.3292205 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 19250410.1063/1.2737934 ↗
15. Scripta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 215510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.037 ↗
16. Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2012 · 14 · 60110.1002/adem.201200074 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 781210.1063/1.1446114 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 375210.1063/1.1624633 ↗
19. IEEE T. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 250530410.1109/TMAG.2015.2453054 ↗
20. 1998
21. 1965