Comparison on the coercivity enhancement of the sintered NdFeB magnets by grain boundary diffusion with Tb70Cu30 powders prepared by different milling methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Coercivity enhancement of the sintered NdFeB magnets by grain boundary diffusion (GBD) with Tb70Cu30 powders prepared by different milling methods has been compared. The commercial NdFeB sintered magnets with the magnetic properties of Br=14.0 kG, iHc= 17.5 kOe and (BH)max= 48.4 MGOe are chosen as original magnets. The coercivity increment of the NdFeB magnets is 7.6 kOe and 9.4 kOe after GBD with Tb70Cu30 alloy powders made by high energy ball milling (HEBM) and low-energy ball milling (LEBM), respectively. Higher coercivity increment can be obtained for the magnet GBD treated with Tb70Cu30 powders prepared by LEBM, mainly related to their platelet shape. The platelet shape powders may provide the wider contact area between GBD source and the surface of the magnets. The above effect is helpful in improving diffusion efficiency and enhancing coercivity accordingly. As a result, magnetic properties of Br=13.6 kG, iHc= 25.1 kOe and (BH)max= 46.1 MGOe are achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, National Chung Cheng University 1 , Chia-Yi 621, Taiwan
New Materials Research & Development Department, China Steel Corporation 2 , Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
R&D Department, Himag Magnetic Corporation 3 , Pingtung 912, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan · China Steel Corporation
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1986 · 59 · 87310.1063/1.336611 ↗
2. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 82110.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
3. Permanent magnets: Plugging the gap10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.036 ↗
4. J. Phys.-Condens. Mat. · 2014 · 26 · 06420210.1088/0953-8984/26/6/064202 ↗
5. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 44 · 06400110.1088/0022-3727/44/6/064001 ↗
6. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2006 · 42 · 290910.1109/tmag.2006.879906 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17A73310.1063/1.4916542 ↗
8. AIP Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 04213610.1063/1.4803657 ↗
9. Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 306110.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.046 ↗
10. Mater. Res. Express · 2020 · 7 · 01610110.1088/2053-1591/ab56f4 ↗
11. Acta Mater. · 2016 · 115 · 27810.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.003 ↗
12. Scripta Mater. · 2018 · 148 · 2910.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.021 ↗
13. J. Alloy Compd. · 2019 · 780 · 57410.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.412 ↗
14. Scripta Mater. · 2018 · 155 · 5010.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.06.020 ↗
15. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2011 · 323 · 29710.1016/j.jmmm.2010.09.021 ↗
16. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2014 · 355 · 13110.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.007 ↗
17. Acta Mater. · 2016 · 115 · 35410.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.048 ↗
18. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 05620510.1063/1.5006575 ↗
19. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 471 · 10510.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.079 ↗
20. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 504 · 16668510.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166685 ↗
21. Scripta Mater. · 2017 · 138 · 8310.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.05.048 ↗
22. 2007