journal article·2018-05-01Open access

Role of CoFeB thickness in electric field controlled sub-100 nm sized magnetic tunnel junctions

James Lourembam, Jiancheng Huang, Sze Ter Lim, Ernult Franck Gerard

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

We report a comprehensive study on the role of the free layer thickness (tF) in electric-field controlled nanoscale perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs), comprising of free layer structure Ta/Co40Fe40B20/MgO, by using dc magnetoresistance and ultra-short magnetization switching measurements. Focusing on MTJs that exhibits positive effective device anisotropy (Keff), we observe that both the voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy (ξ) and voltage modulation of coercivity show strong dependence on tF. We found that ξ varies dramatically and unexpectedly from ∼−3 fJ/V-m to ∼−41 fJ/V-m with increasing tF. We discuss the possibilities of electric-field tuning of the effective surface anisotropy term, KS as well as an additional interfacial magnetoelastic anisotropy term, K3 that scales with 1/tF2. Voltage pulse induced 180° magnetization reversal is also demonstrated in our MTJs. Unipolar switching and oscillatory function of switching probability vs. pulse duration can be observed at higher tF, and agrees well with the two key device parameters — Keff and ξ.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Data Storage Institute , 2 Fusionopolis Way, 138634, Singapore

Funding

DSI Core Fund

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2005 · 308 · 50810.1126/science.1110549 ↗
2. Proc. IEEE · 2008 · 96 · 178610.1109/jproc.2008.2004313 ↗
3. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. · 2010 · 18 · 172410.1109/tvlsi.2009.2032192 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08G51010.1063/1.2165169 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07C72010.1063/1.3556784 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07C70910.1063/1.3549605 ↗
7. Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 86810.1038/nmat1257 ↗
8. Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 86210.1038/nmat1256 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 8250810.1063/1.2976435 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Express · 2008 · 1 · 91301110.1143/apex.1.091301 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2010 · 57 · 102310.1109/ted.2010.2043389 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 97 · 242510
13. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 7400410.1088/0022-3727/46/7/074004 ↗
14. Nat. Phys. · 2012 · 8 · 49210.1038/nphys2298 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 5110.1109/tmag.2015.2443124 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 21240610.1063/1.4880720 ↗
17. Science · 2007 · 315 · 34910.1126/science.1136629 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2016 · 5 · 4400610.1103/physrevapplied.5.044006 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 21250510.1063/1.3595318 ↗
20. Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 11 · 3910.1038/nmat3172 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 10240610.1063/1.4751035 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 12240310.1063/1.4753816 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 7240810.1063/1.4818676 ↗
24. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 20910.1038/nnano.2015.22 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 19240610.1063/1.4948763 ↗
26. Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 11 · 6410.1038/nmat3171 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 2250610.1063/1.3279157 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 6240210.1063/1.4817268 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 1240310.1063/1.4939446 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 5241510.1063/1.4892824 ↗
31. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 4241010.1063/1.4891843 ↗
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17261510.1063/1.4870917 ↗
33. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 704310.1063/1.1667808 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 1440410.1103/physrevb.94.014404 ↗
35. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 21250310.1063/1.3429592 ↗
36. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 2240510.1063/1.4973700 ↗
37. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 2440410.1103/physrevb.93.024404 ↗