journal article·2022-07-01Open access

Effect of cross-sectional geometry on the compression fatigue behavior of NiTi refrigerants

Guoan Zhou, Lingyun Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

Elastocaloric refrigeration requires refrigerants with a good heat transfer ability and a high fatigue life. A million-level fatigue life can be normally obtained for NiTi refrigerants via compressive loading. However, existing compression-based NiTi elastocaloric prototypes only focus on tube refrigerants, and no research has been reported on the cross-sectional geometry design and its influence on the compression fatigue behavior of NiTi refrigerants. Here, we propose tubular NiTi refrigerants of hole-type, fin-type, and layer-type cross sections and compare their compression fatigue behavior with NiTi tubes of the same cross-sectional area under cyclic loading of 20 Hz and 900 MPa. Results show that to achieve a larger specific heat transfer area (SA), the compression fatigue life of NiTi tubes monotonically decreases because of the decrease in the wall-thickness, while the layer-type NiTi refrigerant maintains a relatively high fatigue life of 1.7 × 106 cycles at a high SA level (3.83 cm2 g−1). This gives us insight into enhancing elastocaloric refrigerants’ heat transfer ability and fatigue life via geometry design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 1 , Hong Kong, China

Guangdong Eco-engineering Polytechnic 2 , Guangdong Province, China

Funding

Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality · Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. · 2018 · 90 · 55710.1016/j.rser.2018.03.099 ↗
2. Int. J. Refrig. · 2018 · 86 · 44110.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.12.006 ↗
3. Energies · 2022 · 15 · 288010.3390/en15082880 ↗
4. Processes · 2022 · 10 · 21810.3390/pr10020218 ↗
6. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 06715310.1063/1.4922871 ↗
7. Nat. Energy · 2016 · 1 · 1613410.1038/nenergy.2016.134 ↗
8. Sci. Technol. Built Environ. · 2016 · 22 · 50010.1080/23744731.2016.1171630 ↗
9. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 12500210.1063/1.5051760 ↗
10. Science · 2019 · 366 · 111610.1126/science.aax7616 ↗
11. Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 1853210.1038/s41598-019-54411-8 ↗
12. APL Mater. · 2016 · 4 · 06410210.1063/1.4948271 ↗
13. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 42400610.1088/1361-6463/aa8656 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 12490110.1063/1.4913878 ↗
15. Appl. Mater. Today · 2020 · 19 · 10055710.1016/j.apmt.2020.100557 ↗
16. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 42400310.1088/1361-6463/aa87a2 ↗
17. Appl. Mater. Today · 2020 · 20 · 10071210.1016/j.apmt.2020.100712 ↗
18. Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 159 · 6210.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.09.012 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 09390210.1063/1.5115793 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 07390410.1063/1.4746257 ↗
21. Appl. Therm. Eng. · 2022 · 202 · 11783810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117838 ↗
22. Acta Mater. · 2020 · 195 · 14110.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.008 ↗
23. Int. J. Fatigue · 2020 · 141 · 10588710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105887 ↗
24. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. · 2022 · 33 · 50310.1177/1045389x211023582 ↗
25. Int. J. Fatigue · 2016 · 82 · 73010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.09.032 ↗
26. AIP Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 07521010.1063/5.0058946 ↗
27. Appl. Mater. Today · 2022 · 26 · 10137710.1016/j.apmt.2022.101377 ↗