journal article·2021-11-01Open access

New governing equations for fluid dynamics

Chaoqun Liu, Zhining Liu

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

The difference in the governing equation between inviscid and viscous flows is the introduction of viscous terms. Traditional Navier–Stokes (NS) equations define stress based on Stokes’s assumptions. In NS equations, stress is supposedly proportional to strain, and both strain and stress tensors are symmetric. There are several questions with NS equations, which include the following: 1. Both symmetric shear terms and stretching terms in strain and stress are coordinate-dependent and thus not Galilean invariant. 2. The physical meaning of both diagonal and off-diagonal elements is not clear, which is coordinate-dependent. 3. It is hard to measure strain and stress quantitatively, and viscosity is really measured by vorticity, not by symmetric strain. 4. There is no vorticity tensor in NS equations, which plays an important role in fluid flow, especially for turbulent flow. The newly proposed governing equations for fluid dynamics use the vorticity tensor only, which is anti-symmetric. The advantages include the following: 1. Both shear and stress are anti-symmetric, which are Galilean invariants and independent of coordinate rotation. 2. The physical meaning of off-diagonal elements is clear, which is anti-symmetric shear stress. 3. Viscosity coefficients are obtained by experiments, which use vorticity. 4. The vorticity term can be further decomposed into rigid rotation and anti-symmetric shear, which are important to turbulence research. 5. The computation cost for the viscous term is reduced to half as the diagonal terms are all zero and six elements are reduced to three. Several computational examples are tested, which clearly demonstrate both NS and new governing equations have exactly the same results. As shown below, the new governing equation is identical to NS equations in mathematics, but the new one has lower cost and the several advantages mentioned above, including the possibility to study turbulent flow better. It is recommended to use the new governing equation instead of NS equations. The unique definition and operation of vectors and tensors by matrix and matrix operation are also discussed in this paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Arlington 1 , Arlington, Texas 76019, USA

HyperComp, Inc. 2 , Thousand Oaks, California 91361, USA

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Hydrodynamica: Danielis Bernoulli, Hydrodynamicasiva de viribus et motibusfluidorum comment arii (1738)
2. Principes généraux du mouvement des fluides
3. On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion and of the equilibrium and motion of elastic solids
4. 1967
5. ÜberIntegrale der hydrodynamischen Gleichungen, welcher der Wirbelbewegungen entsprechen10.1515/crll.1858.55.25 ↗
6. 2018
7. 1989
8. Vortex identification: New requirements and limitations10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.03.004 ↗
9. Evaluation of vortex criteria by virtue of the quadruple decomposition of velocity gradient tensor10.7498/aps.63.054704 ↗
10. Third generation of vortex identification methods: Omega and Liutex/Rortex based systems10.1007/s42241-019-0022-4 ↗
11. Rortex—A new vortex vector definition and vorticity tensor and vector decompositions10.1063/1.5023001 ↗
12. Rortex and comparison with eigenvalue-based vortex identification criteria10.1063/1.5040112 ↗
13. Explicit expressions for Rortex tensor and velocity gradient tensor decomposition10.1063/1.5118948 ↗
14. Explicit formula for the Liutex vector and physical meaning of vorticity based on the Liutex-Shear decomposition10.1007/s42241-019-0032-2 ↗
15. Comparisons and analyses of vortex identification between Omega method and Q criterion10.1007/s42241-019-0025-1 ↗
16. A Liutex based definition and identification of vortex core center lines10.1007/s42241-019-0048-7 ↗
17. Galilean invariance of Omega vortex identification method10.1007/s42241-019-0024-2 ↗
18. Liutex core definition and automatic identification for turbulence structures10.1007/s42241-019-0066-5 ↗
19. Objective Omega vortex identification method10.1007/s42241-019-0028-y ↗
20. Determination of epsilon for Omega vortex identification method10.1007/s42241-018-0066-x ↗
21. Liutex theoretical system and six core elements of vortex identification10.1007/s42241-020-0018-0 ↗
22. A selected review of vortex identification methods with applications10.1007/s42241-018-0112-8 ↗
23. POD analysis on vortical structures in MVG wake by Liutex core line identification10.1007/s42241-020-0037-x ↗
24. Mathematical foundation of turbulence generation from symmetric to asymmetric Liutex10.1007/s42241-019-0049-6 ↗
25. Liutex similarity in turbulent boundary layer10.1007/s42241-019-0094-1 ↗
26. Physics of turbulence generation and sustenance in a boundary layer10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.06.032 ↗
27. Turbulent mixing and transition criteria of flows induced by hydrodynamic instabilities10.1063/1.5088745 ↗
28. 2009
29. F. Keller, Algebraic Properties of Matrices, Transpose, Inner and Outer Product (PDF), inf.ed.ac.uk, Retrieved September 6, 2020.
30. 1987 · 7
31. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain-rate_tensor for Wiki, strain-rate tensor.
32. 2008 · 134
33. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow10.1017/s0022112083002839 ↗
34. Validation of the simulation of flow in an S-duct