On the utility of a well-mixed model for predicting disease transmission on an urban bus
Source abstract
Abstract
The transport of virus-laden aerosols from a host to a susceptible person is governed by complex turbulent airflow and physics related to breathing, coughing and sneezing, mechanical and passive ventilation, thermal buoyancy effects, surface deposition, masks, and air filtration. In this paper, we study the infection risk via airborne transmission on an urban bus using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations and a passive-scalar model of the virus-laden aerosol concentration. Results from these simulations are directly compared to the widely used well-mixed model and show significant differences in the concentration field and number of inhaled particles. Specifically, in the limit of low mechanical ventilation rates, the well-mixed model will overpredict the concentration far from the infected passenger and substantially underpredict the concentration near the infected passenger. The results reported herein also apply to other enclosed spaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infection Control and Ventilation · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, University of Michigan 1 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2145, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan 2 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2145, USA
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. A guideline to limit indoor airborne transmission of COVID-1910.1073/pnas.2018995118 ↗
2. On respiratory droplets and face masks10.1063/5.0015044 ↗
3. On airborne virus transmission in elevators and confined spaces10.1063/5.0038180 ↗
4. Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent flow generated during a violent expiratory event10.1063/5.0042086 ↗
5. Assessing and controlling infection risk with Wells-Riley model and spatial flow impact factor (SFIF)10.1016/j.scs.2021.102719 ↗
6. Superspreading events suggest aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by accumulation in enclosed spaces10.1103/physreve.103.033109 ↗
7. Predicting the spatially varying infection risk in indoor spaces using an efficient airborne transmission model
8. The numerical computation of turbulent flows
9. Peering inside a cough or sneeze to explain enhanced airborne transmission under dry weather10.1038/s41598-021-89078-7 ↗
10. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by inhalation of respiratory aerosol in the Skagit Valley Chorale superspreading event10.1111/ina.12751 ↗
11. A mathematical framework for estimating risk of airborne transmission of COVID-19 with application to face mask use and social distancing10.1063/5.0025476 ↗
12. Role of pulsatility on particle dispersion in expiratory flows10.1063/5.0048746 ↗
13. How can airborne transmission of COVID-19 indoors be minimised?10.1016/j.envint.2020.105832 ↗
14. Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112560 ↗
15. Airborne transmission route of COVID-19: Why 2 meters/6 feet of inter-personal distance could not be enough10.3390/ijerph17082932 ↗
16. Community outbreak investigation of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among bus riders in Eastern China10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5225 ↗
17. Simulation of aerosol transmission on a Boeing 737 airplane with intervention measures for COVID-19 mitigation10.1063/5.0044720 ↗
18. Modelling aerosol transport and virus exposure with numerical simulations in relation to SARS-CoV-2 transmission by inhalation indoors10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104866 ↗
19. Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-1910.1073/pnas.2009637117 ↗
20. Disease transmission through expiratory aerosols on an urban bus10.1063/5.0037452 ↗