journal article·2015-07-01Open access

Current induced magnetization switching in Co/Cu/Ni-Fe nanopillar with orange peel coupling

D. Aravinthan, P. Sabareesan, M. Daniel

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 7

Abstract

The impact of orange peel coupling on spin current induced magnetization switching in a Co/Cu/Ni-Fe nanopillar device is investigated by solving the switching dynamics of magnetization of the free layer governed by the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert-Slonczewski (LLGS) equation. The value of the critical current required to initiate the magnetization switching is calculated analytically by solving the LLGS equation and verified the same through numerical analysis. Results of numerical simulation of the LLGS equation using Runge-Kutta fourth order procedure shows that the presence of orange peel coupling between the spacer and the ferromagnetic layers reduces the switching time of the nanopillar device from 67 ps to 48 ps for an applied current density of 4 × 1012Am−2. Also, the presence of orange peel coupling reduces the critical current required to initiate switching, and in this case, from 1.65 × 1012Am−2 to 1.39 × 1012Am−2.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · ZnO doping and properties · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bharathidasan University 1 Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics, School of Physics, , Tiruchirappalli - 620 024, India

SASTRA University 2 Centre for Nonlinear Science and Engineering, School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, , Thanjavur - 613 401, India

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2007 · 317 · 153710.1126/science.1145336 ↗
2. Science · 2001 · 294 · 148810.1126/science.1065389 ↗
3. Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 81310.1038/nmat2024 ↗
4. Phys. Scr. · 2011 · 84 · 03570610.1088/0031-8949/84/03/035706 ↗
5. Nature · 2003 · 425 · 35910.1038/425359a ↗
6. Science · 1999 · 285 · 86710.1126/science.285.5429.867 ↗
7. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 935310.1103/PhysRevB.54.9353 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 428110.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4281 ↗
10. Europhys. Lett. · 1999 · 45 · 62610.1209/epl/i1999-00213-1 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 314910.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3149 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 1231710.1103/PhysRevB.62.12317 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 23660110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.236601 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 681210.1063/1.1446123 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 366310.1063/1.1374230 ↗
16. Nature · 2003 · 425 · 38010.1038/nature01967 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 17660410.1103/PhysRevLett.93.176604 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 02440410.1103/PhysRevB.68.024404 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 01444610.1103/PhysRevB.72.014446 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10E30210.1063/1.1847292 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 09390710.1063/1.2800999 ↗
22. Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 21010.1038/nmat1595 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 389710.1063/1.1739271 ↗
24. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2010 · 322 · 67510.1016/j.jmmm.2009.10.039 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1986 · 57 · 244210.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2442 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 96 · 9910.1103/PhysRev.96.99 ↗
27. Prog. Theor. Phys. · 1956 · 16 · 4510.1143/PTP.16.58 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. · 1957 · 106 · 89310.1103/PhysRev.106.893 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 67 · 160210.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1602 ↗
30. Bland · 2005 · 9910.1007/3-540-27163-5˙4 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 72010.1103/PhysRevB.49.720 ↗
32. C. R. Acad. Sci., · 1962 · 255 · 1676
33. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 18040210.1103/PhysRevB.69.180402 ↗
34. du Trémolet de Lacheisserie · 2005 · 25510.1007/978-0-387-23063-4˙6 ↗
35. Hillebrands · 2003 · 9310.1007/3-540-46097-7˙4 ↗
36. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 446610.1063/1.370376 ↗
37. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 237310.1063/1.1315633 ↗
38. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 575910.1063/1.372513 ↗
39. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 61 · 964210.1103/PhysRevB.61.9642 ↗
40. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 761210.1063/1.1361056 ↗
41. Europhys. Lett. · 2004 · 65 · 12310.1209/epl/i2003-10063-9 ↗
42. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 679310.1063/1.1362642 ↗
43. Hillebrands · 2006 · 110.1007/10938171˙1 ↗
44. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 62210.1063/1.125838 ↗
45. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 02250110.1063/1.2756109 ↗
46. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1996 · 32 · 463010.1109/20.539101 ↗
47. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 24720410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.247204 ↗