journal article·2021-01-01Open access

SmN and DyN: Effect of the nitrogen to rare earth flux ratio on the structural, transport, and magnetic properties

A. Shaib, W. F. Holmes-Hewett, J. Chan, P. P. Murmu, B. J. Ruck, H. J. Trodahl, F. Natali

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

We report on the effect of the nitrogen to rare earth (N2/RE) flux ratio on the structural, transport, and magnetic properties of samarium nitride (SmN) and dysprosium nitride (DyN) thin films. Both materials display a reduced lattice constant when the N2/RE flux ratio decreases, i.e., with increased nitrogen vacancies (VN) concentration. The films show several orders of magnitude increase in the electrical resistivity with increased N2/RE flux ratio. Finally, magnetic measurements on DyN films display a deviation from the free ion moment at low temperature, which is eased in more conductive films. This was interpreted as a further reduction in the quenching of the orbital angular momentum caused by the increased VN concentration. The Curie temperature was also found to increase with VN.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington , P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6012, New Zealand

Funding

Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment · MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 58 · 131610.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.06.002 ↗
2. Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 84910.1038/nmat3116 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 13240910.1063/1.4800455 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 558110.1002/adma.201300636 ↗
5. Nanotechnology · 2020 · 31 · 23520210.1088/1361-6528/ab7886 ↗
6. Physical Review Applied · 2016 · 6 · 04400210.1103/physrevapplied.6.044002 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 13441410.1103/physrevb.87.134414 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 98 · 23520110.1103/physrevb.98.235201 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 17440610.1103/physrevb.78.174406 ↗
10. Phys. Status Solidi C · 2012 · 9 · 60510.1002/pssc.201100363 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 02410610.1103/physrevb.94.024106 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 23533510.1103/physrevb.73.235335 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 1250310.1063/1.3566996 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 95 · 05443110.1103/physrevb.95.054431 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 12530310.1103/physrevb.81.125303 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 02240110.1063/1.4905598 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 123 · 11510610.1063/1.5020081 ↗
18. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2011 · 1290 · 40410.1557/opl.2011.383 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 01440310.1103/physrevb.83.014403 ↗
20. Mater. Res. Express · 2020 · 7 · 04640410.1088/2053-1591/ab802f ↗
21. Solid State Commun. · 1987 · 63 · 92910.1016/0038-1098(87)90342-5 ↗
22. Solid State Commun. · 1984 · 51 · 53910.1016/0038-1098(84)91029-9 ↗
23. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · 1990 · 2 · 829310.1088/0953-8984/2/42/007 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 06443110.1103/physrevb.93.064431 ↗
25. J. Chan, S. Lambie, J. Trodahl, D. Lefebvre, M. Le Ster, A. Shaib, F. Ullstad,S. Brown, B. Ruck, A. Garden, and F. Natali, ChemRxiv:11796513.v1 (2020).
26. J. Cryst. Growth · 2010 · 312 · 358310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.09.030 ↗
27. ACS Omega · 2019 · 4 · 595010.1021/acsomega.9b00293 ↗
28. 1979
29. W. F. Holmes-Hewett, Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, 2020.
30. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 03520210.1103/physrevb.87.035202 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 05441310.1103/physrevb.93.054413 ↗
32. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2010 · 322 · 197310.1016/j.jmmm.2010.01.016 ↗