Ultrasonic spray coating as an approach for large-area polymer OLEDs: The influence of thin film processing and surface roughness on electrical performance
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article we present a detailed comparison of ultrasonic spray coating and spin coating for the fabrication of polymer organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). Single-carrier devices of hole-transporting polymer poly[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-co-(4,4’(N-(4-sec-butylphenyl))) diphenylamine] (TFB) were fabricated by ultrasonic spray coating. Uniform reference devices using spin coating were also made. We have shown, across a range of device thicknesses from 37 nm to 138 nm, typical of those used in OLED hole-transport layers, that there is no statistical difference in the hole-injection efficiency between ultrasonic spray coating and spin coating. We have also demonstrated the importance of controlling the roughness of the films and we determine a threshold of 10 nm average roughness below which injection efficiency is not controlled by roughness. However, above 10 nm roughness we find a reduction in injection efficiency up to an 86 % loss in performance for roughnesses of the order of 40 % the thickness of the film. By optimising the deposition parameters, in order to allow the wet films to start to equilibrate, we find a wide processing window for smooth uniform films with excellent injection efficiency. This work reinforces the importance of ultrasonic spray coating as a potential route to high volume manufacturing of OLED based technology.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield , Hicks Building, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 497510.1002/adma.201401286 ↗
2. Org. Electron. Physics, Mater. Appl. · 2009 · 10 · 58710.1016/j.orgel.2009.02.010 ↗
3. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2012 · 103 · 7610.1016/j.solmat.2012.04.027 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 494910.1002/adma.201002234 ↗
5. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 72410.1002/adma.200902917 ↗
6. 2015 · 1
7. Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2010 · 65 · 200010.1016/j.ces.2009.11.042 ↗
8. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2009 · 93 · 44710.1016/j.solmat.2008.10.026 ↗
9. Org. Electron. Physics, Mater. Appl. · 2013 · 14 · 100210.1016/j.orgel.2013.01.023 ↗
10. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2013 · 3 · 50510.1002/aenm.201200713 ↗
11. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 6410.1002/adfm.201001562 ↗
12. Prog. Photovolt Res. Appl. · 2016 · 24 · 27510.1002/pip.2665 ↗
13. Vacuum · 2017 · 139 · 15410.1016/j.vacuum.2016.09.017 ↗
14. APL Mater. · 2015 · 3 · 12610810.1063/1.4937553 ↗
15. Proc. SPIE - Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2014 · 9183 · 91831110.1117/12.2060994 ↗
16. Org. Electron. Physics, Mater. Appl. · 2015 · 20 · 3110.1016/j.orgel.2015.01.015 ↗
17. Coatings · 2014 · 4 · 6010.3390/coatings4010060 ↗
18. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 796210.1038/s41598-017-08642-2 ↗
19. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 294410.1039/c4ee01546k ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 17211610.1063/1.2369545 ↗
21. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 30410.1002/adfm.200800738 ↗
22. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 24110.1002/(sici)1521-4095(199903)11:3<241::aid-adma241>3.0.co;2-j ↗
23. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 610410.1021/am301732m ↗
24. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 267710.1002/adfm.201303242 ↗
25. 2005 · 2003
26. Org. Electron. · 2008 · 9 · 27910.1016/j.orgel.2007.11.003 ↗
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 08451010.1063/1.2721830 ↗
28. Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 231110.1002/adma.201405217 ↗
29. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 267010.1063/1.367030 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 143910.1063/1.368179 ↗
31. ChemPhysChem · 2004 · 5 · 1610.1002/cphc.200300942 ↗
32. 1940
33. Adv. Phys. · 1952 · 1 · 110.1080/00018735200101151 ↗
34. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 20351210.1063/1.2741055 ↗
35. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 3
36. Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 160210.1021/nl080155l ↗
37. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. · 2008 · 245 · 81410.1002/pssb.200743457 ↗
38. Synth. Met. · 2010 · 160 · 54010.1016/j.synthmet.2009.11.027 ↗
39. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1997 · 55 · R65610.1103/physrevb.55.r656 ↗
40. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 1
41. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. · 2006 · 24 · 122810.1116/1.2202858 ↗
42. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104
43. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 1718410.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03964 ↗
44. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 386710.1103/physrevlett.86.3867 ↗
45. Eur. Phys. J. E · 2012 · 35 · 210.1140/epje/i2012-12002-5 ↗
46. Phys. Rev. E · 2013 · 88 · 02260110.1103/physreve.88.022601 ↗
47. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 103810.1038/nmat3722 ↗
48. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2001 · 64 · 1
49. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 11910.1002/adfm.200900352 ↗