An impedance spectroscopy study of magnetodielectric coupling in BaTiO3-CoFe2O4 nanostructured multiferroics
Source abstract
Abstract
Granular BaTiO3-CoFe2O4 (BTO-CFO) nanocomposites were prepared by combining polyol synthesis and spark plasma sintering (SPS). This method allows samples with a high density and a very small grain size (less than 150 nm), and thus a large interface area between phases. In order to study the involved magnetoelectric effects, the impedance response of these nanomaterials was measured in the 5 Hz-10 MHz frequency range, under 0-7.5 kOe magnetic applied fields, and in the 40-170°C temperature range. The best agreement to model these results by an equivalent circuit was achieved by means of three parallel RC arrangements connected in series; by their RC values, these circuits are representative of grain boundaries. An association between each RC circuit and each interface (or grain boundary), i. e., BTO-BTO, BTO-CFO, and CFO-CFO, is proposed on the basis of their temperature and magnetic behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Dielectric properties of ceramics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 1 Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, , 04510, México
Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS-UMR 7086 2 ITODYS, , 75205 Paris Cedex, France
Instituto de Cibernética, Matemáticas y Física 3 Departamento de Física Aplicada, , La Habana, Cuba
Universidad de la Habana 4 Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales, , La Habana, Cuba
Funding
DGAPA-UNAM · Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Sov. Phys. JETP · 1960 · 11 · 708
2. Nature · 2006 · 442 · 75910.1038/nature05023 ↗
3. Eur. Phys. J. B · 2009 · 71 · 29310.1140/epjb/e2009-00266-4 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 22440710.1103/PhysRevB.75.224407 ↗
5. J. All. & Comp. · 2015 · 638 · 34410.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.121 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 10290210.1063/1.2177543 ↗
7. Nature Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 2110.1038/nmat1805 ↗
8. Adv. Mater. · 1990 · 2 · 13210.1002/adma.19900020304 ↗
9. 2005 · 91
10. Appl. Nanosci. · 2012 · 2 · 26110.1007/s13204-012-0103-y ↗
11. Appl. Phys. A · 2015 · 120 · 61510.1007/s00339-015-9224-y ↗
12. Mater. Lett. · 2012 · 79 · 6510.1016/j.matlet.2012.03.076 ↗
13. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2014 · 370 · 8710.1016/j.jmmm.2014.06.014 ↗
14. J. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 41 · 76310.1007/s10853-006-6555-2 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 800230410.1109/TMAG.2014.2323942 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 39 · 1348610.1103/PhysRevB.39.13486 ↗
17. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1996 · 79 · 163310.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08775.x ↗
18. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 400 · 31110.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.044 ↗
19. 2005 · 8
20. Nature · 1939 · 144 · 32710.1038/144327b0 ↗
21. Int. J. Inorg. Mater. · 2001 · 3 · 120510.1016/S1466-6049(01)00128-3 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 215310.1063/1.1463211 ↗
23. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2004 · 24 · 143910.1016/S0955-2219(03)00510-7 ↗
24. Magn Mater. · 2006 · 306 · 110.1016/j.jmmm.2006.01.238 ↗
25. Phys. Uspekhi · 1994 · 37 · 56310.1070/PU1994v037n06ABEH000026 ↗
26. Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2015 · 128 · B-1910.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-19 ↗
27. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 11713010.1063/1.4935924 ↗
28. Appl. Sci. A · 2016 · 122 · 50
29. Nature · 2006 · 442 · 75910.1038/nature05023 ↗