journal article·2016-05-01Open access

Improvement of magnetic hysteresis loss, corrosion resistance and compressive strength through spark plasma sintering magnetocaloric LaFe11.65Si1.35/Cu core-shell powders

Caiyin You, Shaopeng Wang, Jing Zhang, Nannan Yang, Na Tian

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 5

Abstract

LaFe11.65Si1.35/Cu core-shell powders were achieved by self-designed magnetron sputtering system, which presents a better solidification during spark plasma sintering in comparison to the naked LaFe11.65Si1.35 powders. Much higher compressive strength, lower corrosion current density and magnetic hysteresis losses are achieved for the sintered sample of LaFe11.65Si1.35/Cu core-shell powders without significant decrease of the magnetic entropy change. The compressive strength, corrosion current density and maximum magnetic hysteresis losses are 105.6 MPa/16.8 MPa, 1.08 × 10−3A/cm2/3.03 × 10−3 A/cm2 and 1.33 J/kg/2.71 J/kg, respectively for the sintered samples of core-shell structured/naked powders. The technique of fabricating the core-shell structured powders demonstrated here is also applicable for other types of functional powders.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Xi’an University of Technology School of Materials Science and Technology, , Xi’an 710048, P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Chin. Phys. · 2000 · 9 · 55010.1088/1009-1963/9/7/016 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. on Magn. · 2001 · 37 · 232810.1109/20.951162 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 127610.1063/1.1498148 ↗
4. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 354110.1016/j.jmmm.2008.03.013 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 25191610.1063/1.2750540 ↗
6. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 373510.1002/adma.201000177 ↗
7. Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 426810.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.027 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 06240710.1063/1.4865236 ↗
9. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2012 · 2 · 132310.1002/aenm.201200297 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 10390910.1063/1.4795265 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Mag. · 2015 · 51 · 2501502
12. Script. Mater. · 2016 · 120 · 5810.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.04.021 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10M30510.1063/1.1847871 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07A91610.1063/1.3063067 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. · 2009 · B 79 · 13440810.1103/PhysRevB.79.134408 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Letter. · 2009 · 95 · 25250410.1063/1.3276565 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 07240310.1063/1.3684244 ↗
18. J. Alloy. Comp. · 2016 · 666 · 6510.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.119 ↗
19. He · 2005 · 170