Improvement of magnetic hysteresis loss, corrosion resistance and compressive strength through spark plasma sintering magnetocaloric LaFe11.65Si1.35/Cu core-shell powders
Source abstract
Abstract
LaFe11.65Si1.35/Cu core-shell powders were achieved by self-designed magnetron sputtering system, which presents a better solidification during spark plasma sintering in comparison to the naked LaFe11.65Si1.35 powders. Much higher compressive strength, lower corrosion current density and magnetic hysteresis losses are achieved for the sintered sample of LaFe11.65Si1.35/Cu core-shell powders without significant decrease of the magnetic entropy change. The compressive strength, corrosion current density and maximum magnetic hysteresis losses are 105.6 MPa/16.8 MPa, 1.08 × 10−3A/cm2/3.03 × 10−3 A/cm2 and 1.33 J/kg/2.71 J/kg, respectively for the sintered samples of core-shell structured/naked powders. The technique of fabricating the core-shell structured powders demonstrated here is also applicable for other types of functional powders.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xi’an University of Technology School of Materials Science and Technology, , Xi’an 710048, P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Chin. Phys. · 2000 · 9 · 55010.1088/1009-1963/9/7/016 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. on Magn. · 2001 · 37 · 232810.1109/20.951162 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 127610.1063/1.1498148 ↗
4. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 354110.1016/j.jmmm.2008.03.013 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 25191610.1063/1.2750540 ↗
6. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 373510.1002/adma.201000177 ↗
7. Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 426810.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.027 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 06240710.1063/1.4865236 ↗
9. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2012 · 2 · 132310.1002/aenm.201200297 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 10390910.1063/1.4795265 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Mag. · 2015 · 51 · 2501502
12. Script. Mater. · 2016 · 120 · 5810.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.04.021 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10M30510.1063/1.1847871 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07A91610.1063/1.3063067 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. · 2009 · B 79 · 13440810.1103/PhysRevB.79.134408 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Letter. · 2009 · 95 · 25250410.1063/1.3276565 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 07240310.1063/1.3684244 ↗
18. J. Alloy. Comp. · 2016 · 666 · 6510.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.119 ↗
19. He · 2005 · 170