Effect of processing parameters on microstructure of MoS2 ultra-thin films synthesized by chemical vapor deposition method
Source abstract
Abstract
MoS2 ultra-thin layers are synthesized using a chemical vapor deposition method based on the sulfurization of molybdenum trioxide (MoO3). The ultra-thin layers are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy and atomic force microscope (AFM). Based on our experimental results, all the processing parameters, such as the tilt angle of substrate, applied voltage, heating time and the weight of source materials have effect on the microstructures of the layers. In this paper, the effects of such processing parameters on the crystal structures and morphologies of the as-grown layers are studied. It is found that the film obtained with the tilt angle of 0.06° is more uniform. A larger applied voltage is preferred to the growth of MoS2 thin films at a certain heating time. In order to obtain the ultra-thin layers of MoS2, the weight of 0.003 g of source materials is preferred. Under our optimal experimental conditions, the surface of the film is smooth and composed of many uniformly distributed and aggregated particles, and the ultra-thin MoS2 atomic layers (1∼10 layers) covers an area of more than 2 mm×2 mm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Ichthyology and Marine Biology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hangzhou Dianzi University 1 Department of Physics, School of Science, , Hangzhou 310018, P.R.China
Hangzhou Dianzi University 2 Center for Integrated Spintronic Devices, , Hangzhou 310018, P.R.China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Solid-State Electronics · 2014 · 101 · 210.1016/j.sse.2014.06.013 ↗
2. Nano Letters · 2012 · 12 · 153810.1021/nl2043612 ↗
3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 1109310.1002/anie.201106004 ↗
4. Nature Nanotechnology · 2014 · 9 · 102410.1038/nnano.2014.222 ↗
5. Applied Surface Science · 2014 · 297 · 13910.1016/j.apsusc.2014.01.103 ↗
6. Nature Materials · 2014 · 13 · 109110.1038/nmat4061 ↗
7. Journal of American Chemical Society · 2014 · 136 · 785310.1021/ja5033327 ↗
8. Nature Nanotechnology · 2014 · 9 · 68210.1038/nnano.2014.167 ↗
9. Physics Letters A · 2012 · 376 · 116610.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.029 ↗
10. Acas Nano · 2013 · 6 · 563510.1021/nn301572c ↗
11. Physica E · 2014 · 63 · 27610.1016/j.physe.2014.06.017 ↗
12. Nature Materials · 2014 · 13 · 109610.1038/nmat4064 ↗
13. Nature Nanotechnology · 2011 · 2011 · 14710.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
14. Optical Materials · 2013 · 35 · 35235210.1016/j.optmat.2013.06.033 ↗
15. Applied Physics Letters · 2014 · 104 · 12210410.1063/1.4870067 ↗
16. Physical Review Letters · 2010 · 105 · 13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
17. Solid State Sciences · 2015 · 40 · 110.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2014.12.004 ↗
18. PNAS · 2005 · 26 · 1045110.1073/pnas.0502848102 ↗
19. Journal of Applied Physics · 1966 · 37 · 192810.1063/1.1708627 ↗
20. Angew.Chem. · 2010 · 122 · 415310.1002/ange.201000009 ↗
21. Science · 2011 · 331 · 56710.1126/science.1194975 ↗
22. Small · 2012 · 8 · 96610.1002/smll.201102654 ↗
23. Advanced Materials · 2012 · 24 · 232010.1002/adma.201104798 ↗
24. Nature Nanotechnology · 2007 · 2 · 5310.1038/nnano.2006.171 ↗
25. 2011 · 141
26. Applied Physics Letters · 2012 · 101 · 22190710.1063/1.4768299 ↗
27. Nano Letters · 2010 · 10 · 127110.1021/nl903868w ↗
28. Applied Surface Science · 2014 · 307 · 31910.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.034 ↗