journal article·2021-04-01Open access

Comparison of atmospheric pressure argon producing O(1S) and helium plasma jet on methylene blue degradation

S. Jaiswal, E. M. Aguirre

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 4

Abstract

A solution of methylene blue dye was degraded under an atmospheric pressure plasma jet operating in a linear field configuration with pure argon or pure helium as working gases. Optical emission spectroscopy was carried out to understand the reactive species present with and without dye treatment. Both plasma jets contain reactive species such as OH, N2, and atomic oxygen (O). However, atomic oxygen takes a greatly different form depending on the working gas. In the argon plasma jet, we observe that most of the atomic oxygen produced is the O(1S)–O(1D) transition that also leads to the green colored plasma plume. On the other hand, the helium plasma jet produces the well known triplet states of oxygen at 777 and 844 nm. The absorption spectra confirmed the faster and more energy efficient degradation of the methylene blue dye when treated by the argon plasma jet. Argon plasma with enhanced atomic oxygen content can be utilized as a cheaper and efficient method for waste water treatment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasma Applications and Diagnostics · Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University 1 , Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

Department of Physics, Auburn University 2 , Auburn, Alabama 36832, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 24 · 06400110.1088/0963-0252/24/6/064001 ↗
2. Trends Biotechnol. · 2017 · 36 · 58610.1016/j.tibtech.2017.06.013 ↗
3. Phys. Rep. · 2014 · 540 · 12310.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.006 ↗
4. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. · 2005 · 14 · 771
5. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2004 · 92 · 163310.1002/app.13714 ↗
6. Bioresour. Technol. · 2001 · 77 · 24710.1016/s0960-8524(00)00080-8 ↗
7. J. Polym. Environ. · 2019 · 27 · 223910.1007/s10924-019-01514-y ↗
8. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 4 · 75
9. Plasma Res. Express · 2020 · 2 · 01500910.1088/2516-1067/ab6703 ↗
10. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. · 2008 · 28 · 67710.1007/s11090-008-9155-x ↗
11. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. · 2007 · 27 · 58910.1007/s11090-007-9087-x ↗
12. Water · 2019 · 11 · 181810.3390/w11091818 ↗
13. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 17 · 02500610.1088/0963-0252/17/2/025006 ↗
14. Chemosphere · 2017 · 180 · 23910.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.126 ↗
15. J. Electrost. · 2019 · 101 · 10336010.1016/j.elstat.2019.103360 ↗
16. Chem. Eng. J. · 2010 · 162 · 25010.1016/j.cej.2010.05.041 ↗
17. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 27520110.1088/0022-3727/46/27/275201 ↗
18. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 16520110.1088/0022-3727/43/16/165201 ↗
19. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 25 · 01500510.1088/0963-0252/25/1/015005 ↗
20. Sci. Rep. · 2021 · 11 · 189310.1038/s41598-021-81488-x ↗
21. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 38 · 190510.1088/0022-3727/38/12/009 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 08330410.1063/1.2794857 ↗
23. D. E. Ashpis, M. C. Laun, and E. L. Griebeler, Technical Report NASA/TM-2012-0217449, National Aeronautics and Space Adminstration, 2012.
24. Plasma Res. Express · 2020 · 2 · 04500210.1088/2516-1067/abbe9b ↗
25. Eur. Phys. J. D · 2004 · 28 · 11910.1140/epjd/e2003-00291-5 ↗
26. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2007 · 16 · 21710.1088/0963-0252/16/2/002 ↗
27. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 41520210.1088/0022-3727/47/41/415202 ↗
28. R. F. Boivin, “Study of the different line broadening mechanisms for the laser induced fluorescence diagnostic of the HELIX and LEIA plasmas,” Technical Report PLP-039, West Virginia University, 1998.
29. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer · 1968 · 8 · 137910.1016/0022-4073(68)90081-2 ↗
30. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 24 · 03400110.1088/0963-0252/24/3/034001 ↗
31. 2019
32. Plasma Processes Polym. · 2006 · 3 · 58710.1002/ppap.200600051 ↗
33. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. · 2014 · 119 · 226310.1002/2013ja019208 ↗
34. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. · 2012 · 15 · 19710.1515/jaots-2012-0123 ↗
35. Chem. Eng. J. · 2013 · 217 · 4110.1016/j.cej.2012.11.116 ↗
36. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 · 2006 · 45 · 886410.1143/jjap.45.8864 ↗
37. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 25350910.1063/1.4772639 ↗
38. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2010 · 38 · 295410.1109/tps.2010.2058870 ↗
39. Phys. Plasmas · 2020 · 27 · 10351210.1063/5.0021028 ↗
40. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 02330510.1063/1.4774328 ↗
41. Chemosphere · 2016 · 155 · 24310.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.026 ↗
42. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3441910.1038/srep34419 ↗
43. Chem. Eng. J. · 2015 · 282 · 11610.1016/j.cej.2015.02.027 ↗
44. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. · 1972 · 5 · 68610.1088/0022-3700/5/3/035 ↗
45. J. Chem. Phys. · 1968 · 49 · 475810.1063/1.1669957 ↗
46. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 126 · 07330210.1063/1.5096407 ↗
47. J. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2009 · 8 · 627
48. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 21400110.1088/1361-6463/aa6c53 ↗