Modeling and simulation of arc and contact wire molten pool behavior during pantograph lowering process
Source abstract
Abstract
Contact wire is an essential part of traction power supply system in the electrified railway, which on the one hand transmits the electrical energy, and on the other hand plays as a smooth track for the current collection strip. In the daily operation of the electrified train maintenance, the contact wire suffers from the arcing ablation during the pantograph lowering process. Potential contact wire breakdown might take place. In this paper, the surface erosion of the contact wire by the pantograph arcing was studied numerically. A multi-physical model dedicated to the contact wire erosion issues was established, with the process of heat transfer, phase transition, and liquid metal flow taken into account. Characteristics of the surface erosion, the temperature field as well as the flow field under different current conditions were studied respectively. Particularly, the Marangoni effects on molten pool evolutions were examined, which could have a significant influence on the final erosion characteristics. This work might be helpful for the further understanding of the basic physical process of the contact wire erosion by the pantograph arcing, and as well as providing a meaningful reference for the performance improvement of the current collection system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis · Vacuum and Plasma Arcs · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Plasma. Sci. · 2016 · 44 · 271510.1109/tps.2016.2601117 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Plasma. Sci. · 2016 · 44 · 243810.1109/tps.2016.2601314 ↗
3. Tribol Int · 2018 · 123 · 25610.1016/j.triboint.2017.12.032 ↗
4. Wear · 2014 · 321 · 7010.1016/j.wear.2014.10.009 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag., Manuf. Technol. · 2016 · 6 · 41810.1109/tcpmt.2016.2530118 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. · 2001 · 50 · 166110.1109/19.982964 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Power Deliver · 2009 · 24 · 193110.1109/tpwrd.2009.2021035 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Power Deliver · 2009 · 24 · 194010.1109/tpwrd.2009.2021036 ↗
9. Tribol Int · 2013 · 61 · 8810.1016/j.triboint.2012.11.020 ↗
10. Wear · 2009 · 266 · 4610.1016/j.wear.2008.05.006 ↗
11. Tribol Int · 2015 · 92 · 4710.1016/j.triboint.2015.05.019 ↗
12. Proc. Instn Mech.Engrs, Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit · 2016 · 230 · 168710.1177/0954409715607906 ↗
13. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 11351110.1063/1.5011202 ↗
14. J Phys D Appl Phys · 2016 · 49 · 07520210.1088/0022-3727/49/7/075202 ↗
15. Wear · 2015 · 332 · 94910.1016/j.wear.2014.11.004 ↗
16. Wear · 2013 · 302 · 149210.1016/j.wear.2012.11.029 ↗
17. Tribol Int · 2014 · 79 · 810.1016/j.triboint.2014.05.003 ↗
18. IEEE Trans. Plasma. Sci. · 2013 · 41 · 255110.1109/tps.2013.2273832 ↗
19. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 04230610.1063/1.4943285 ↗
20. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 04511710.1063/1.4948453 ↗
21. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · 1974 · 14 · 11110.1016/0022-4073(74)90004-1 ↗
22. J Phys D Appl Phys · 2004 · 37 · 330910.1088/0022-3727/37/23/013 ↗
23. J Phys D Appl Phys · 2002 · 35 · 292510.1088/0022-3727/35/22/306 ↗
24. J Phys D Appl Phys · 2010 · 43 · 43401110.1088/0022-3727/43/43/434011 ↗
25. J Phys D Appl Phys · 2006 · 39 · 363410.1088/0022-3727/39/16/017 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 18330210.1063/1.4967528 ↗
27. J Phys D Appl Phys · 2017 · 50 · 45520310.1088/1361-6463/aa8db3 ↗
28. J Phys D Appl Phys · 2013 · 46 · 49550110.1088/0022-3727/46/49/495501 ↗
29. Metallurgical Transactions B · 1988 · 19 · 48310.1007/bf02657748 ↗
30. High Voltage Engineering · 2015 · 41 · 3531