journal article·2016-02-01Open access

Defect reduction in overgrown semi-polar (11-22) GaN on a regularly arrayed micro-rod array template

Y. Zhang, J. Bai, Y. Hou, R. M. Smith, X. Yu, Y. Gong, T. Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 2

Abstract

We demonstrate a great improvement in the crystal quality of our semi-polar (11-22) GaN overgrown on regularly arrayed micro-rod templates fabricated using a combination of industry-matched photolithography and dry-etching techniques. As a result of our micro-rod configuration specially designed, an intrinsic issue on the anisotropic growth rate which is a great challenge in conventional overgrowth technique for semi-polar GaN has been resolved. Transmission electron microscopy measurements show a different mechanism of defect reduction from conventional overgrowth techniques and also demonstrate major advantages of our approach. The dislocations existing in the GaN micro-rods are effectively blocked by both a SiO2 mask on the top of each GaN micro-rod and lateral growth along the c-direction, where the growth rate along the c-direction is faster than that along any other direction. Basal stacking faults (BSFs) are also effectively impeded, leading to a distribution of BSF-free regions periodically spaced by BSF regions along the [-1-123] direction, in which high and low BSF density areas further show a periodic distribution along the [1-100] direction. Furthermore, a defect reduction model is proposed for further improvement in the crystalline quality of overgrown (11-22) GaN on sapphire.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Sheffield Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, , Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · R1002410.1103/PhysRevB.56.R10024 ↗
2. Nature (London) · 2000 · 406 · 86510.1038/35022529 ↗
3. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 · 2000 · 39 · 41310.1143/JJAP.39.413 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett · 2009 · 95 · 13310710.1063/1.3240401 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 170610.1063/1.124796 ↗
6. J. Cryst. Growth · 2000 · 221 · 31610.1016/S0022-0248(00)00707-7 ↗
7. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2010 · 57 · 8810.1109/TED.2009.2033773 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Express · 2009 · 2 · 09210110.1143/APEX.2.092101 ↗
9. Electron. Lett. · 2007 · 43 · 82510.1049/el:20071323 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 376810.1063/1.126775 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 06190810.1063/1.2172159 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 18210910.1063/1.2735558 ↗
13. J. Cryst. Growth · 2009 · 311 · 288710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.01.036 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 18190710.1063/1.3658803 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 10190610.1063/1.4795619 ↗
16. ECS Transactions · 2015 · 66 · 15110.1149/06601.0151ecst ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 08112610.1063/1.2338784 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 19190310.1063/1.3134489 ↗
19. J. Cryst. Growth · 2010 · 312 · 262510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.05.038 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 342110.1063/1.126666 ↗
21. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 27 · 02400410.1088/0268-1242/27/2/024004 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 23191210.1063/1.3447940 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07310210.1063/1.3103305 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 26210510.1063/1.2423328 ↗