Electrospinning jet behaviors under the constraints of a sheath gas
Source abstract
Abstract
Increasing the ejection efficiency and uniformity of nanofibers is the key to applications of electrospinning technology. In this work, a novel electrospinning spinneret with a sheath gas passageway is designed. The frictional resistance that stems from the sheath gas provides additional stretching and restriction forces on the jet. The sheath gas also reduces interference and enhances the stability of the charged jet. A bead-on-strain simulation model is built up to determine the constraint effects of the sheath gas. Simulation results show that the sheath gas decreases the motion area and increases the stretching ratio of the liquid jet. The stretching force from the sheath gas decreases the diameter and increases the uniformity of the nanofiber. As the gas pressure increases from 0 kPa to 50 kPa, the critical voltage of the jet ejection decreases from 8.4 kV to 2.5 kV, the diameter of the nanofiber deposition zone decreases from 40 cm to 10 cm, and the diameter of the nanofibers decreases from 557.97 nm to 277.73 nm. The uniformity of nanofibers can be improved significantly using a sheath gas. The sheath gas contributes to the rapid deposition of a uniform nanofibrous membrane and the industrial applications of electrospinning.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xiamen University 1 School of Aerospace Engineering, , Xiamen 361005, China
Xiamen University of Technology 2 School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, , Xiamen 361024, China
Funding
Key Project of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Membr. Sci. · 2012 · 392 · 16710.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.019 ↗
2. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 876610.1021/am4026032 ↗
3. Mater. Lett. · 2013 · 109 · 5810.1016/j.matlet.2013.07.051 ↗
4. J Hazard Mater. · 2013 · 244 · 12110.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.020 ↗
5. Chem. Cent. J. · 2015 · 267 · 132
6. Chin. Phys. B. · 2014 · 23 · 06610210.1088/1674-1056/23/6/066102 ↗
7. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 41550110.1088/0022-3727/43/41/415501 ↗
8. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 72610.1021/nl9040719 ↗
9. RSC ADV. · 2013 · 3 · 2495210.1039/c3ra42622j ↗
10. 625
11. 64
12. Phys. Fluids · 2011 · 23 · 09410810.1063/1.3637638 ↗
13. 41009
14. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2009 · 114 · 88310.1002/app.30505 ↗
15. Iran Polym J. · 2009 · 18 · 89
16. Polymer · 2010 · 51 · 414010.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.058 ↗
17. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. · 2010 · 36 · 13110.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.002 ↗
18. Opt. Precision Eng. · 2015 · 23 · 106210.3788/ope.20152304.1062 ↗
19. Key Eng. Mater. · 2015 · 645-646 · 4510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.645-646.45 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 09430810.1063/1.2799059 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. · 2016 · 122 · 11210.1007/s00339-015-9584-3 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. · 2016 · 122 · 80910.1007/s00339-016-0314-2 ↗
23. Opt. Precision Eng. · 2016 · 24 · 113810.3788/ope.20162405.1138 ↗
24. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 10510310.1063/1.4964620 ↗
25. Microfluid. Nanofluid. · 2016 · 20 · 11810.1007/s10404-016-1785-3 ↗
26. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 44 · 13550210.1088/0022-3727/44/13/135502 ↗
27. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 36530210.1088/0022-3727/49/36/365302 ↗
28. Cellul. Chem. Technol. · 2013 · 47 · 323
29. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2014 · 53 · 825710.1021/ie404268f ↗
30. J. Non-Newton. Fluid · 2008 · 153 · 13010.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.12.005 ↗
31. J. Non-Newton. Fluid · 2008 · 153 · 9510.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.11.011 ↗