Prompt loss of beam ions in KSTAR plasmas
Source abstract
Abstract
For a toroidal plasma facility to realize fusion energy, researching the transport of fast ions is important not only due to its close relation to the heating and current drive efficiencies but also to determine the heat load on the plasma-facing components. We present a theoretical analysis and orbit simulation for the origin of lost fast-ions during neutral beam injection (NBI) heating in Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR) device. We adopted a two-dimensional phase diagram of the toroidal momentum and magnetic moment and describe detectable momentums at the fast-ion loss detector (FILD) position as a quadratic line. This simple method was used to model birth ions deposited by NBI and drawn as points in the momentum phase space. A Lorentz orbit code was used to calculate the fast-ion orbits and present the prompt loss characteristics of the KSTAR NBI. The scrape-off layer deposition of fast ions produces a significant prompt loss, and the model and experimental results closely agreed on the pitch-angle range of the NBI prompt loss. Our approach can provide wall load information from the fast ion loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Korea University of Science and Technology 1 , Daejeon 34113, South Korea
National Fusion Research Institute 2 , Daejeon 34133, South Korea
National Institute for Fusion Science 3 , Toki 509-5292, Japan
Funding
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning · National Research Foundation
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 12500110.1088/0029-5515/54/12/125001 ↗
2. Nucl. Fusion · 1994 · 34 · 53510.1088/0029-5515/34/4/I07 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 61210.1103/PhysRevLett.69.612 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 114 · 01500210.1103/PhysRevLett.114.015002 ↗
5. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1986 · 57 · 177410.1063/1.1139178 ↗
6. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2008 · 79 · 02350210.1063/1.2827514 ↗
7. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 07350110.1063/1.4731655 ↗
8. Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 10301310.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103013 ↗
9. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 10D30510.1063/1.4733550 ↗
10. Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 03250110.1063/1.2890771 ↗
11. Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 12300810.1088/0029-5515/53/12/123008 ↗
12. 2006 · 74
13. J. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2009 · 8 · 330
14. Nucl. Fusion · 1990 · 30 · 103510.1088/0029-5515/30/6/006 ↗
15. Nucl. Fusion · 2015 · 55 · 043010.1088/0029-5515/55/4/043004 ↗
16. J. Comp. Phys. · 1981 · 43 · 6110.1016/0021-9991(81)90111-X ↗
17. Fusion Eng. Design · 2012 · 87 · 156710.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.05.011 ↗
18. NUBEAM simulation for off-axis NBI design in KSTAR