journal article·2016-06-01Open access

Dynamic susceptibility of onion in ferromagnetic elliptical nanoring

Congpu Mu, Jiefang Song, Jianghong Xu, Fusheng Wen

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 6

Abstract

Micromagnetic simulation was performed to investigate the equilibrium state and dynamic susceptibility spectra of magnetic elliptical nanoring. There are two equilibrium states (onion and vortex) obtained in elliptical nanoring. The onion state can be used to record information in MRAM. And it is important to investigate the dynamic susceptibility spectra of onion state, which is closely related to writing and reading speed of magnetic memory devices. Those results show that two or three resonance peaks are found under different thickness of elliptical nanoring with onion state, respectively. The low resonance frequency of two resonance peaks is increasing with the arm width of the elliptical ring, but is decreasing with the thickness. However, the high frequency of two resonance peaks is decreasing with the arm width of the elliptical ring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Yanshan University 1 School of Science, , Qinhuangdao 066004, People’s Republic of China

Yanshan University 2 National Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, , Qinhuangdao 066004, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 02302710.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023027 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 07311410.1063/1.3687177 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 14250810.1063/1.2998584 ↗
4. Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 142610.1038/srep01426 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 21442210.1103/PhysRevB.87.214422 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 114 · 13720110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.137201 ↗
7. Nat. Phys. · 2005 · 1 · 172-6
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 01240610.1063/1.4890088 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 11430510.1063/1.3506531 ↗
10. Phys. B · 2010 · 405 · 1325-8
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 07390310.1063/1.4913211 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17B71410.1063/1.4913820 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 05442510.1103/PhysRevB.84.054425 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 06040210.1103/PhysRevB.80.060402 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 10442110.1103/PhysRevB.78.104421 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 08390810.1063/1.3108537 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 05720710.1103/PhysRevLett.96.057207 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 13240110.1103/PhysRevB.77.132401 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 22443210.1103/PhysRevB.77.224432 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 13443210.1103/PhysRevB.77.134432 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 17B90710.1063/1.4799777 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 18442510.1103/PhysRevB.67.184425 ↗
23. IEEE Tran. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 295710.1109/TMAG.2011.2159370 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 22390310.1063/1.4882295 ↗
25. Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 27910.1038/ncomms1277 ↗
26. Nature · 2002 · 418 · 509-1210.1038/nature00905 ↗
27. Nature · 2006 · 444 · 461-410.1038/nature05240 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 05442610.1103/PhysRevB.79.054426 ↗
29. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 7012-410.1063/1.1360390 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 13240710.1063/1.4799657 ↗
31. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 3268-7010.1063/1.1361282 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 14442810.1103/PhysRevB.77.144428 ↗
33. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 6604-610.1063/1.1667457 ↗
34. J. Magn. Magn. Mate. · 2010 · 322 · 2480-4
35. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 17240810.1103/PhysRevB.70.172408 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 04720410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.047204 ↗