Dynamic susceptibility of onion in ferromagnetic elliptical nanoring
Source abstract
Abstract
Micromagnetic simulation was performed to investigate the equilibrium state and dynamic susceptibility spectra of magnetic elliptical nanoring. There are two equilibrium states (onion and vortex) obtained in elliptical nanoring. The onion state can be used to record information in MRAM. And it is important to investigate the dynamic susceptibility spectra of onion state, which is closely related to writing and reading speed of magnetic memory devices. Those results show that two or three resonance peaks are found under different thickness of elliptical nanoring with onion state, respectively. The low resonance frequency of two resonance peaks is increasing with the arm width of the elliptical ring, but is decreasing with the thickness. However, the high frequency of two resonance peaks is decreasing with the arm width of the elliptical ring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yanshan University 1 School of Science, , Qinhuangdao 066004, People’s Republic of China
Yanshan University 2 National Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, , Qinhuangdao 066004, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 02302710.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023027 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 07311410.1063/1.3687177 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 14250810.1063/1.2998584 ↗
4. Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 142610.1038/srep01426 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 21442210.1103/PhysRevB.87.214422 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 114 · 13720110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.137201 ↗
7. Nat. Phys. · 2005 · 1 · 172-6
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 01240610.1063/1.4890088 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 11430510.1063/1.3506531 ↗
10. Phys. B · 2010 · 405 · 1325-8
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 07390310.1063/1.4913211 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17B71410.1063/1.4913820 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 05442510.1103/PhysRevB.84.054425 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 06040210.1103/PhysRevB.80.060402 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 10442110.1103/PhysRevB.78.104421 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 08390810.1063/1.3108537 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 05720710.1103/PhysRevLett.96.057207 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 13240110.1103/PhysRevB.77.132401 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 22443210.1103/PhysRevB.77.224432 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 13443210.1103/PhysRevB.77.134432 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 17B90710.1063/1.4799777 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 18442510.1103/PhysRevB.67.184425 ↗
23. IEEE Tran. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 295710.1109/TMAG.2011.2159370 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 22390310.1063/1.4882295 ↗
25. Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 27910.1038/ncomms1277 ↗
26. Nature · 2002 · 418 · 509-1210.1038/nature00905 ↗
27. Nature · 2006 · 444 · 461-410.1038/nature05240 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 05442610.1103/PhysRevB.79.054426 ↗
29. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 7012-410.1063/1.1360390 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 13240710.1063/1.4799657 ↗
31. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 3268-7010.1063/1.1361282 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 14442810.1103/PhysRevB.77.144428 ↗
33. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 6604-610.1063/1.1667457 ↗
34. J. Magn. Magn. Mate. · 2010 · 322 · 2480-4
35. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 17240810.1103/PhysRevB.70.172408 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 04720410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.047204 ↗