journal article·2014-06-01Open access

Evolution and interaction of twins, dislocations and stacking faults in rolled α-brass during nanostructuring at sub-zero temperature

Barna Roy, Nand Kishor Kumar, Padinharu Madathil Gopalakrishnan Nambissan, Jayanta Das

AIP Advances· Volume 4· Issue 6

Abstract

The effect of cryorolling (CR) strain at 153 K on the evolution of structural defects and their interaction in α−brass (Cu–30 wt.% Zn) during nanostructuring has been evaluated. Even though the lattice strain increases up to 2.1 × 10−3 at CR strain of 0.6 initially, but it remains constant upon further rolling. Whereas, the twin density (β) increases to a maximum value of 5.9 × 10−3 at a CR strain of 0.7 and reduces to 1.1 × 10−5 at 0.95. Accumulation of stacking faults (SFs) and lattice disorder at the twin boundaries causes dynamic recrystallization, promotes grain refinement and decreases the twin density by forming subgrains. Detailed investigations on the formation and interaction of defects have been done through resistivity, positron lifetime and Doppler broadening measurements in order to understand the micro-mechanism of nanostructuring at sub-zero temperatures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur 1 Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, , West Bengal 721302, India

Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics 2 Applied Nuclear Physics Division, , 1/AF Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700064, India

Funding

DST, SERB, Govt. of India

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 45 · 10310.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
2. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2004 · 375 · 17810.1016/j.msea.2003.10.170 ↗
3. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2008 · 474 · 34210.1016/j.msea.2007.06.014 ↗
4. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2011 · 530 · 67510.1016/j.msea.2011.10.002 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 03431910.1063/1.2006974 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 10311210.1063/1.1879111 ↗
7. Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 23010.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.020 ↗
8. Scr. Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 16310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.048 ↗
9. Scr. Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 97510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.060 ↗
10. Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 394210.1016/j.msea.2010.02.076 ↗
11. JOM · 2014 · 66 · 9510.1007/s11837-013-0803-0 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 05190310.1063/1.4817180 ↗
13. Mater. Res. Lett. · 2013 · 1 · 12610.1080/21663831.2013.792019 ↗
14. Mater. Res. Lett. · 2013 · 1 · 8110.1080/21663831.2013.779601 ↗
15. Int. J. Plast. · 2014 · 56 · 15610.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.009 ↗
16. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2012 · 20 · 02400110.1088/0965-0393/20/2/024001 ↗
17. 1989
18. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. · 1990 · 2 · 994110.1088/0953-8984/2/49/018 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 04350210.1063/1.3622333 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 02550310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.025503 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 63210.1063/1.1594836 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B. · 2001 · 64 · 22410510.1103/PhysRevB.64.224105 ↗
23. Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 500110.1002/adma.200901991 ↗
24. Scr. Mater. · 2009 · 60 · 31710.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.10.031 ↗
25. Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 542110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.062 ↗
26. 1984
27. J. Physique. · 1984 · 45 · 147910.1051/jphys:019840045090147900 ↗
28. Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 402510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-7 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 12190610.1063/1.2356310 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 08370810.1063/1.2799087 ↗
31. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 384 · 24510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.014 ↗
32. Chinese Phys. Lett. · 1990 · 7 · 31210.1088/0256-307X/7/7/007 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. B. · 1998 · 58 · 22610.1103/PhysRevB.58.15226 ↗