Calculated dependence of FePt damping on external field magnitude and direction
Source abstract
Abstract
Near the Curie temperature (Tc), magnetic parameters including magnetization, anisotropy, and damping depend strongly on both temperature and length scale. This manifestation of renormalization theory is most readily seen in the case of magnetization where the magnitude of the atomic spin is largely unaffected by temperature, but the bulk magnetization vanishes at Tc. It has been previously argued that the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert damping parameter alpha exhibits a similar effect owing to its dependence on both atomic effects and magnon-magnon scattering, the latter having a strong length dependence. Here, we calculate, using an anisotropic exchange description of L10 FePt (Tc = 705 K), the damping (and other magnetic properties) dependence on temperature for FePt at length scales around 1.0 nm as appropriate for high temperature micromagnetic simulation. While the damping reduces as the applied field along the easy direction increases, it tends to increase as the field direction is changed to in-plane. The renormalized parameters are also calculated for higher and lower Tc (770K and 630K) by invoking the linear relationship between the exchange stiffness parameter and Curie temperature. This corresponds to doped and/or non-stoichiometric FePt and allows better understanding of the effects of varying anisotropy to exchange ratio.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities MINT Center, Electrical and Computer Engineering, , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
Funding
Seagate
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2013 · 49 · 75110.1109/TMAG.2012.2219300 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17E31710.1063/1.4916184 ↗
3. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 241710.1109/TMAG.2006.879572 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 10240210.1063/1.3691196 ↗
5. IEEE Trans Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 237110.1109/TMAG.2011.2151837 ↗
6. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 17 · R31510.1088/0953-8984/17/7/R01 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Magn · 2009 · 45 · 384810.1109/TMAG.2009.2023877 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2012 · 48 · 318810.1109/TMAG.2012.2196991 ↗
9. 2008
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 698810.1063/1.1355328 ↗
11. J.Phys. D · 2008 · 41 · 16401610.1088/0022-3727/41/16/164016 ↗
12. Appl. Phys.Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 10250110.1063/1.3093816 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 020412–R10.1103/PhysRevB.77.020412 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08F30810.1063/1.2177141 ↗
15. J. Phys. D · 2008 · 41 · 16401510.1088/0022-3727/41/16/164015 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 22240210.1063/1.4768787 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 07240410.1063/1.4909510 ↗
18. Europhys. Lett · 2005 · 69 · 80510.1209/epl/i2004-10404-2 ↗