journal article·2013-05-01Open access

High-visibility ghost imaging from artificially generated non-Gaussian intensity fluctuations

Xue-Feng Liu, Ming-Fei Li, Xu-Ri Yao, Wen-Kai Yu, Guang-Jie Zhai, Ling-An Wu

AIP Advances· Volume 3· Issue 5

Abstract

The image quality in ghost imaging is vital in practical applications. Through theoretical analysis, we find that for thermal light the average intensity as well as the fluctuations of an arbitrary incident field can greatly influence the image quality. Based on this, we suggest an easily realizable scheme to improve the visibility by generating speckles of non-Gaussian intensity distributions with a spatial light modulator. Numerical simulation demonstrates that this method can significantly improve the visibility, and the effect on the imaging resolution is also discussed. This method may thus be helpful in promoting the implementation of ghost imaging in real applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Random lasers and scattering media · Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 Laboratory of Space Science Experiment Technology, Center for Space Science and Applied Research, , Beijing 100190, China

Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 Laboratory of Optical Physics, Institute of Physics and Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, , Beijing 100190, China

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. A · 1995 · 52 · R342910.1103/PhysRevA.52.R3429 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 12360210.1103/PhysRevLett.87.123602 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 06360110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.063601 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. A. · 2008 · 77 · 04180110.1103/PhysRevA.77.041801 ↗
5. Opt. Lett. · 2005 · 30 · 235410.1364/OL.30.002354 ↗
6. Opt. Lett. · 2009 · 34 · 69510.1364/OL.34.000695 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 11360110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.113601 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 09390310.1103/PhysRevLett.92.093903 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 09360210.1103/PhysRevLett.93.093602 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. A. · 2004 · 70 · 01380210.1103/PhysRevA.70.013802 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 71 · 05660710.1103/PhysRevE.71.056607 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 20110210.1063/1.2919719 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. A · 2008 · 77 · 05380110.1103/PhysRevA.77.053801 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. A · 2009 · 79 · 05384410.1103/PhysRevA.79.053844 ↗
15. Opt. Lett. · 2009 · 34 · 334310.1364/OL.34.003343 ↗
16. Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 35 · 116610.1364/OL.35.001166 ↗
17. Appl. Opt. · 2007 · 46 · 629110.1364/AO.46.006291 ↗
18. Chin. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 29 · 07421610.1088/0256-307X/29/7/074216 ↗
19. Phys. Lett. A · 2010 · 374 · 100510.1016/j.physleta.2009.12.030 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 25360310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.253603 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. A · 2008 · 78 · 06180210.1103/PhysRevA.78.061802 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. A · 2009 · 79 · 05384010.1103/PhysRevA.79.053840 ↗
23. Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 35 · 239110.1364/OL.35.002391 ↗
24. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2008 · 25 · 8310.1109/MSP.2007.914730 ↗