journal article·2017-09-01Open access

Analysis of interface workfunction and process-induced damage of reactive-plasma-deposited ITO/SiO2/Si stack

T. Kamioka, Y. Hayashi, Y. Isogai, K. Nakamura, Y. Ohshita

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 9

Abstract

Workfunction of reactive-plasma deposited indium-tin-oxide (RPD-ITO) at the ITO/SiO2 interface, which is referred as interface workfunction, and the process-induced damage are experimentally extracted for the first time based on capacitance-voltage (C-V) analysis. The estimated interface workfunction value of 4.74 eV for as-deposition condition is about 0.4 eV higher than that in the bulk determined by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS). The RPD process induces the damage at the Si/SiO2 interface, and the degree of the damage is evaluated as the interface defect density (Dit) to be around 1012 cm-2eV-1. The effects of forming-gas annealing on the interface workfunction and recovery of the damage are also studied. The interface workfunction value once decreases to 4.53 eV by the annealing up to 250 oC and then turns to increase to 4.77 eV after 400 oC annealing. The damage is annihilated by the low-temperature forming-gas annealing at 200 oC.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Toyota Technological Institute 1 , Nagoya, Aichi 468-8511, Japan

Meiji University 2 , Kawasaki, Kanagawa 214-8571, Japan

Funding

New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 2016 · 2473
2. Materials Research Bulletin · 2012 · 47 · 303210.1016/j.materresbull.2012.04.106 ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 29510.1063/1.371859 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 68 · 269910.1063/1.116313 ↗
5. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1617810.1021/ja3026906 ↗
6. Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 96710.1021/nl404389u ↗
7. IEEE Dev. Lett. · 2004 · 25 · 37210.1109/led.2004.829043 ↗
8. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1967 · 114 · 26610.1149/1.2426565 ↗
9. Solid-State Electronics · 1974 · 17 · 76910.1016/0038-1101(74)90023-9 ↗
10. Solid-State Electronics · 1975 · 18 · 16910.1016/0038-1101(75)90100-8 ↗
11. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 29 · L198410.1143/jjap.29.l1984 ↗
12. Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 420-421 · 7010.1016/s0040-6090(02)00656-9 ↗
13. 2009 · 2817
14. Energy Procedia · 2011 · 8 · 20710.1016/j.egypro.2011.06.125 ↗
15. Energy Procedia · 2016 · 92 · 44310.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.125 ↗
16. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 54 · 01AB0510.7567/jjap.54.01ab05 ↗
17. 2016 · 443
18. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 56 · 04CS0910.7567/jjap.56.04cs09 ↗
19. IEEE J. Photovoltaics · 2014 · 4 · 9610.1109/jphotov.2013.2282737 ↗
20. IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · 2002 · 8 · 34610.1109/2944.999190 ↗
21. 2006
22. Surf. Sci. · 1971 · 28 · 15710.1016/0039-6028(71)90092-6 ↗
23. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1992 · 262 · 80310.1557/proc-262-803 ↗
24. Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. · 2005 · 13 · 48110.1002/pip.646 ↗
25. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A · 1996 · 377 · 17710.1016/0168-9002(96)00205-7 ↗