Frequency stability improvement for piezoresistive micromechanical oscillators via synchronization
Source abstract
Abstract
Synchronization phenomenon first discovered in Huygens’ clock shows that the rhythms of oscillating objects can be adjusted via an interaction. Here we show that the frequency stability of a piezoresistive micromechanical oscillator can be enhanced via synchronization. The micromechanical clamped-clamped beam oscillator is built up using the electrostatic driving and piezoresistive sensing technique and the synchronization phenomenon is observed after coupling it to an external oscillator. An enhancement of frequency stability is obtained in the synchronization state. The influences of the synchronizing perturbation intensity and frequency detuning applied on the oscillator are studied experimentally. A theoretical analysis of phase noise leads to an analytical formula for predicting Allan deviation of the frequency output of the piezoresistive oscillator, which successfully explains the experimental observations and the mechanism of frequency stability enhancement via synchronization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University 1 Department of Mechanics, Key Laboratory of Soft Machines and Smart Devices of Zhejiang Province, , Hangzhou 310027, China
Xi’an Jiaotong University 2 State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, , Xi’an 710049, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Nature Communications · 2012 · 3 · 80610.1038/ncomms1813 ↗
2. Review of Scientific Instruments · 2005 · 76 · 6110110.1063/1.1927327 ↗
3. Journal of Applied Physics · 2007 · 10210.1063/1.2785018 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. A · 1995 · 51 · 421110.1103/physreva.51.4211 ↗
5. Phys Rev Lett · 2015 · 114 · 3410310.1103/physrevlett.114.034103 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 8350110.1063/1.3481361 ↗
7. Applied Physics Letters · 2005 · 87 · 11311210.1063/1.2048813 ↗
8. Applied Physics Letters · 2016 · 10910.1063/1.4964832 ↗
9. Nature Nanotechnology · 2016 · 11 · 55210.1038/nnano.2016.19 ↗
10. 2003 · 432
11. Phys Rev Lett · 2013 · 111 · 8410110.1103/physrevlett.111.084101 ↗
12. Phys Rev Lett · 2014 · 112 · 1410110.1103/physrevlett.112.014101 ↗
13. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems · 2016 · 25 · 87010.1109/jmems.2016.2590881 ↗
14. Micro & Nano Letters · 2013 · 8 · 10710.1049/mnl.2012.0789 ↗
15. 2000
16. Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2007 · 316 · 9510.1126/science.1137307 ↗