Effect of residual chips on the material removal process of the bulk metallic glass studied by in situ scratch testing inside the scanning electron microscope
Source abstract
Abstract
Research on material removal mechanism is meaningful for precision and ultra-precision manufacturing. In this paper, a novel scratch device was proposed by integrating the parasitic motion principle linear actuator. The device has a compact structure and it can be installed on the stage of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) to carry out in situ scratch testing. Effect of residual chips on the material removal process of the bulk metallic glass (BMG) was studied by in situ scratch testing inside the SEM. The whole removal process of the BMG during the scratch was captured in real time. Formation and growth of lamellar chips on the rake face of the Cube-Corner indenter were observed dynamically. Experimental results indicate that when lots of chips are accumulated on the rake face of the indenter and obstruct forward flow of materials, materials will flow laterally and downward to find new location and direction for formation of new chips. Due to similar material removal processes, in situ scratch testing is potential to be a powerful research tool for studying material removal mechanism of single point diamond turning, single grit grinding, mechanical polishing and grating fabrication.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jilin University College of Mechanical Science & Engineering, , Renmin Street 5988, Changchun, Jilin 130025, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu. · 2009 · 49 · 36610.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.007 ↗
2. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Tec. · 2004 · 20 · 23110.1504/IJMPT.2004.004249 ↗
3. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu. · 2012 · 63 · 31
4. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu. · 2003 · 43 · 81110.1016/S0890-6955(03)00050-6 ↗
5. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu. · 2008 · 48 · 69810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.013 ↗
6. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu. · 2010 · 50 · 107710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.08.008 ↗
7. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. · 2010 · 46 · 56310.1007/s00170-009-2114-8 ↗
8. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu. · 2007 · 47 · 161510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.11.003 ↗
9. Microelectron. Eng. · 2003 · 70 · 9310.1016/S0167-9317(03)00398-8 ↗
10. J. Mater. Process. Tech. · 2003 · 138 · 48410.1016/S0924-0136(03)00124-9 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. A · 2009 · 95 · 89910.1007/s00339-009-5097-2 ↗
12. Wear · 2011 · 270 · 24110.1016/j.wear.2010.10.064 ↗
13. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu. · 2011 · 51 · 18210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.11.012 ↗
14. J. Mater. Process. Tech. · 2010 · 210 · 182710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.06.014 ↗
15. Wear · 2011 · 270 · 81510.1016/j.wear.2011.02.008 ↗
16. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1984 · 3 · 13310.1007/BF00723096 ↗
17. Surf. Coat. Technol. · 1990 · 41 · 3110.1016/0257-8972(90)90128-Y ↗
18. Tribol. Int. · 1997 · 30 · 50710.1016/S0301-679X(97)00014-5 ↗
19. Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2001 · 43 · 33510.1016/S0020-7403(00)00019-9 ↗
20. Wear · 2005 · 259 · 1810.1016/j.wear.2005.02.111 ↗
21. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 05500210.1063/1.4711869 ↗
22. Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2011 · 14 · 19510.1002/adem.201100113 ↗
23. Materials · 2012 · 5 · 103310.3390/ma5061033 ↗
24. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. · 2004 · 44 · 91510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.02.002 ↗
25. Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 273010.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.031 ↗
26. J. Mater. Res. · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
27. Tribol. Lett. · 2008 · 31 · 17710.1007/s11249-008-9350-1 ↗
28. J. Mater. Res. · 2000 · 15 · 91310.1557/JMR.2000.0130 ↗