journal article·2015-02-01Open access

High-efficiency transition between rectangular waveguide and domino plasmonic waveguide

Liangliang Liu, Zhuo Li, Bingzheng Xu, Changqing Gu, Chen Chen, Pingping Ning, Jian Yan, Xingyu Chen

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 2

Abstract

In this work, we propose an optimized transition structure to realize smooth and high efficiency conversion from the guided wave supported by a conventional rectangular waveguide (CRW) to the domino plasmon polaritons (DPPs) supported by a domino plasmonic waveguide (DPW) and vice versa in the X-band (8.2GHz∼12.4GHz). This transition structure consists of two tapered CRWs connected by a gradient domino array with optimized gradient heights and lateral widths. Experimental results of the S-parameters show excellent agreement with the simulations and the optimization scheme can be readily extended to other bands. Furthermore, a domino plasmonic power divider is implemented to demonstrate the application of the transition structure in the integration of conventional microwave circuits with plasmonic devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic and Optical Devices · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Key Laboratory of Radar Imaging and Microwave Photonics, Ministry of Education, College of Electronic and Information Engineering, , Nanjing, 210016, China

Funding

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · the Funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education · the priority academic program development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 2003 · 424 · 82410.1038/nature01937 ↗
2. 2007
3. Nature · 2006 · 440 · 50810.1038/nature04594 ↗
4. Science · 2004 · 305 · 84710.1126/science.1098999 ↗
5. J. Opt. A-Pure Appl. Opt. · 2005 · 7 · S9710.1088/1464-4258/7/2/013 ↗
6. Science · 2005 · 308 · 67010.1126/science.1109043 ↗
7. Nat. Photon. · 2008 · 2 · 17510.1038/nphoton.2007.301 ↗
8. Opt. Exp. · 2008 · 16 · 621610.1364/OE.16.006216 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 17680510.1103/PhysRevLett.97.176805 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 23310410.1103/PhysRevB.79.233104 ↗
11. Opt. Lett. · 2009 · 34 · 206310.1364/OL.34.002063 ↗
12. Opt. Exp. · 2010 · 18 · 75410.1364/OE.18.000754 ↗
13. Opt. Exp. · 2010 · 18 · 2149810.1364/OE.18.021498 ↗
14. Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 35 · 42310.1364/OL.35.000423 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 05110810.1063/1.3622646 ↗
16. Opt. Exp. · 2011 · 19 · 2118910.1364/OE.19.021189 ↗
17. Opt. Lett. · 2011 · 36 · 463510.1364/OL.36.004635 ↗
18. Opt. Exp. · 2014 · 22 · 286810.1364/OE.22.002868 ↗
19. Laser Photon. Rev. · 2013 · 10 · 00118
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 19160310.1063/1.4876962 ↗
21. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 31510310.1088/0022-3727/47/31/315103 ↗
22. Electron. Lett. · 2012 · 48
23. J. Electromagn. Analys. and Appl. · 2013 · 5 · 58
24. IEEE Trans.Microw. Theory Techn. · 1956 · 4 · 19710.1109/TMTT.1956.1125062 ↗