journal article·2017-06-01Open access

Multi-stacked GaSb/GaAs type-II quantum nanostructures for application to intermediate band solar cells

Yasushi Shoji, Ryo Tamaki, Yoshitaka Okada

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 6

Abstract

We have investigated the performance of 10-layer stacked GaSb/GaAs quantum dot (QD) and quantum ring (QR) solar cells (SCs) having a type-II band alignment. For both SCs, the external quantum efficiency (EQE) increased in the longer wavelength region beyond GaAs bandedge wavelength of λ > 870 nm due to an additive contribution from GaSb/GaAs QD or QR layers inserted in the intrinsic region of p-i-n SC structure. The EQE of GaSb/GaAs QRSC was higher than that of QDSC at room temperature and the photoluminescence intensity from GaSb/GaAs QRs was stronger compared with GaSb/GaAs QDs. These results indicate that crystal quality of GaSb/GaAs QRs is superior to that of GaSb/GaAs QDs. Furthermore, a photocurrent production due to two-step photo-absorption via GaSb/GaAs QD states or QR states, ΔEQE was measured at low temperature and the ratio of two-step absorption to total carrier extraction defined as ΔEQE / (ΔEQE + EQE), was higher for GaSb/GaAs QRSC than that of QDSC. The ratio of GaSb/GaAs QRSC exceeds 80% over the wavelength region of λ = 950 - 1250 nm. This suggests that two-step absorption process is more dominant for carrier extraction from GaSb/GaAs QR structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST), The University of Tokyo , 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2015 · 2 · 02130210.1063/1.4916561 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 501410.1103/physrevlett.78.5014 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 24640310.1103/physrevlett.91.246403 ↗
4. IEEE J. Photovolt. · 2013 · 310.1109/jphotov.2012.2228296 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 08350510.1063/1.2034090 ↗
6. Adv. Sci. Tech. · 2010 · 74 · 23110.4028/www.scientific.net/ast.74.231 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 20532110.1103/physrevb.78.205321 ↗
8. Physica E · 2010 · 42 · 275710.1016/j.physe.2009.12.036 ↗
9. Energy & Environmental Science · 2012 · 5 · 623310.1039/c2ee01930b ↗
10. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 46 · 02400210.1088/0022-3727/46/2/024002 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 341110.1063/1.122781 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 04432510.1063/1.3688864 ↗
13. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 43 · L66210.1143/jjap.43.l662 ↗
14. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2012 · 24 · 120310.1109/lpt.2012.2200247 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 17312510.1063/1.2734492 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2014 · 1 · 05100310.1103/physrevapplied.1.051003 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 23110110.1063/1.4768942 ↗
18. Optics Express · 2014 · A35910.1364/oe.22.00a359 ↗
19. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 29 · 03501410.1088/0268-1242/29/3/035014 ↗
20. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. · 2015 · 23 · 189610.1002/pip.2615 ↗
21. Proc. of SPIE · 2011 · 7947 · 79470M–210.1117/12.876794 ↗
22. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2008 · 26 · 149210.1116/1.2952451 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 07311810.1063/1.4893879 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 16310510.1063/1.3580765 ↗
25. J. Crys. Grow. · 1999 · 201-202 · 120510.1016/s0022-0248(99)00021-4 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 435510.1063/1.1583853 ↗
27. Physica E · 2005 · 26 · 18010.1016/j.physe.2004.08.048 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 26310310.1063/1.2827582 ↗
29. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 54 · 04DH0110.7567/jjap.54.04dh01 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 68 · 361410.1063/1.115747 ↗
31. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 68 · 154310.1063/1.115693 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 463510.1103/physrevb.58.10064.2 ↗