Water cataracts and the “shortest-time descent” curve (Brachistochrone) as one natural phenomenon
Source abstract
Abstract
This article unveils the connection between design in nature and a classic mathematics problem from 1696 to 1697: the brachistochrone. Some flow designs seem to act as obstacles to flow (cataracts, waterfalls, and roll waves), in contradiction with the natural tendency to facilitate flow (round ducts, bifurcated channels, animal speeds, and frequencies). The brachistochrone problem is to determine the curve of shortest-time descent without friction. The connection communicated in this article is that cataracts, roll waves, and the curve of shortest-time descent are about one natural phenomenon, which is predictable. This is demonstrated by comparing two ways for water to flow downhill: (i) on a stepped path (free fall over a dam, followed by accumulation in a large and nearly stagnant pool) and (ii) on a straight incline. We find that (i) is faster than (ii). In conclusion, brachistochrone-like paths are naturally occurring flow configurations, in accord with common observations of natural flow configurations that facilitate access.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
J. A. Jones Distinguished, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina 27708-0300,
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 2004
2. Rolling stones and turbulent eddies: Why the bigger live longer and travel farther10.1038/srep21445 ↗
3. The brachistochrone problem: Mathematics for a broad audience via a large context problem10.54870/1551-3440.1099 ↗
4. A new problem to whose solution mathematicians are invited
5. De ratione temporis quo grave labitur per rectam data duo puncta conjungentem, ad Tempus brevissimum quo, vi gravitatis, transit ab horum uno ad alterum per arcum cycloidis10.1098/rstl.1695.0074 ↗
6. Brachistochrone with Coulomb friction10.1119/1.9976 ↗
7. Exploring the brachistochrone problem10.1080/00029890.1995.11990579 ↗
8. Brachistochrone with Coulomb friction10.1137/s0363012995287957 ↗
9. 2016
10. 1982
11. 2013
12. 2000
13. Une théorie explique l’intelligence de la nature
14. Constructal theory: From engineering to physics, and how flow systems develop shape and structure10.1115/1.2204075 ↗
15. 2012
16. Constructal theory of flow architecture of the lungs10.1118/1.1705443 ↗
17. Constructal pattern formation in stony corals, bacterial colonies and plant roots under different hydrodynamics conditions10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.010 ↗
18. Constructal theory of pedestrian dynamics10.1016/j.physleta.2009.03.020 ↗
19. Constructal optimization of arborescent structures with flow singularities10.1016/j.ces.2009.05.052 ↗
20. The Constructal Law: from design in nature to social dynamics and wealth as physics10.1016/j.plrev.2011.08.002 ↗
21. Sand size versus beachface slope—An explanation based on the Constructal Law10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.07.008 ↗
22. Constructal design of permeable reactive barriers: Groundwater-hydraulics criteria10.1007/s10665-011-9457-5 ↗
23. Design in nature, and the laws of physics10.1016/j.plrev.2011.07.001 ↗
24. Universality of design and its evolution10.1016/j.plrev.2011.08.003 ↗
25. The importance of the constructal framework in understanding and eventually replicating structure in tissue10.1016/j.plrev.2011.07.007 ↗
26. Progress in study on constructal theory and its applications10.1007/s11431-011-4701-9 ↗
27. Optimal shape of an anthill dome: Bejan’s constructal law revisited10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.021 ↗
28. Progress of constructal theory in China over the past decade10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.064 ↗
29. From cockroaches to tanks: The same power-mass-speed relation describes both biological and artificial ground-mobile systems10.1371/journal.pone.0249066 ↗
30. Oroville Update! Open The Gates! 11 March 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJm0M-3Gh6U.