journal article·2024-02-01Open access

Optimizing transcranial magnetic stimulator coils for minimal influence of individual variability in head geometry

Shuang Liu, Hikaru Yoshioka, Akihiro Kuwahata, Masaki Sekino

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

In prior studies focused on transcranial magnetic stimulator (TMS) coils, optimization of coil windings typically occurred on generic curved surfaces, such as planes or cylindrical shapes. However, these surfaces do not consider the challenge of coil misalignment, which arises due to variations in individual head geometries. This misalignment can significantly diminish the coil's effectiveness. To address this issue, we propose a novel coil design approach that identifies the 'best-fit' curved surface, minimizing the likelihood of mismatch with diverse skull geometries. We further enhance the coil winding pattern using the stream function applied to this custom curved surface. Numerical simulations using a hemisphere brain model demonstrate that the coil designed on this 'best-fit' curved surface exhibits a remarkable 22% increase in efficiency and a 41% expansion in stimulation area compared to the conventional butterfly coil. These findings underscore the advantages of our method in crafting high-efficiency and wide-ranging therapeutic TMS coil.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies · Vestibular and auditory disorders · Migraine and Headache Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo , Tokyo, Japan

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Efficacy of deep rTMS for neuropathic pain in the lower limb: A randomized, double-blind crossover trial of an H-coil and figure-8 coil10.3171/2016.9.jns16815 ↗
2. Electric field depth–focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs10.1016/j.brs.2012.02.005 ↗
3. Antidepressant outcomes of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with F8-coil and deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) with H1-coil in major depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s12888-019-2106-7 ↗
4. Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy10.1088/1741-2552/aac967 ↗
5. Coil optimisation for transcranial magnetic stimulation in realistic head geometry10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.001 ↗
6. Stream function approach for determining optimal surface currents10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00320-6 ↗
7. Magnetic-field modeling with surface currents. Part I. Physical and computational principles of bfieldtools10.1063/5.0016090 ↗
8. The l-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems
9. S. YD , “Fast circle fitting using Landau method,” https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/44219-fast-circle-fitting using landau-method, 2020.
10. Numerical analyses of transcranial magnetic stimulation based on individual brain models by using a scalar-potential finite-difference method10.1109/TMAG.2016.2519443 ↗
11. Figure-eight coils for magnetic stimulation: From focal stimulation to deep stimulation10.3389/fnhum.2021.805971 ↗
12. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: A multisite randomized controlled trial10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018 ↗
13. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop on the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, June 5–7, 199610.1016/s0168-5597(97)00096-8 ↗