Facilitating real-time LED-based photoacoustic imaging with DenP2P: An optimized conditional generative adversarial deep learning solution
Source abstract
Abstract
Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) benefits from the optical absorption contrast of the tissue while achieving greater depth information with ultrasound resolution than the other optical imaging platforms. The recent advancement of moderate pulse width LED (e.g., Acoustic-X) illuminating devices makes PAI more affordable, mobile, and fast with a trade-off for low illumination energy, leading to low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) images, which are averaged over time to get high SNR images. Signal quality can be improved by traditional noise removal algorithms, but deep learning models outperform non-learning methods. Although the most widely used U-Net architecture removes noise, it compromises the structural similarity, introduces blur, and causes edge artifacts. To mitigate those issues, we explored a gamut of architectural options of the Pix2Pix-based conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) analyzing objective functions, optimizers, activation, and normalization layers. The optimized denoising cGAN model based on Pix2Pix architecture (DenP2P) is tested with a variety of out-of-class biological test data such as in vivo mouse tumor, ex vivo kidney, heart, and liver spatially different from training examples. The network is also tested for noise distribution type invariancy concerning Gaussian white, Poisson, speckle, and salt and pepper noise. The frequency domain’s magnitude spectrum analysis explains less blurring for the generated outcomes compared than U-Net. In addition, the persistence homology diagrams (birth, death, and lifetime) underscored DenP2P’s efficacy in diminishing noisy topological features, fostering the emergence of stable and resilient structures. Overall, the optimized DenP2P model generates high SNR images with appreciable peak SNR and structural similarity index.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University , Medford, Massachusetts 02155,
Funding
Tufts School of Engineering · Tufts Data Intensive Science Center Pilot Grant
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. Upon the production and reproduction of sound by light10.1049/jste-1.1880.0046 ↗
2. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine10.1063/1.2195024 ↗
3. Biomedical photoacoustic imaging10.1098/rsfs.2011.0028 ↗
4. Photoacoustic tomography: In vivo imaging from organelles to organs10.1126/science.1216210 ↗
5. Towards clinical translation of LED-based photoacoustic imaging: A review10.3390/s20092484 ↗
6. In vivo tumor vascular imaging with light emitting diode-based photoacoustic imaging system10.3390/s20164503 ↗
7. Oxygen saturation imaging using LED-based photoacoustic system10.3390/s21010283 ↗
8. 2020
9. Progress in biomedical photoacoustic imaging instrumentation toward clinical application10.1063/5.0028190 ↗
10. A comprehensive survey on impulse and Gaussian denoising filters for digital images10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.12.006 ↗
11. 2018
12. The advances and challenges of deep learning application in biological big data processing10.2174/1574893612666170707095707 ↗
13. The transformational role of GPU computing and deep learning in drug discovery10.1038/s42256-022-00463-x ↗
14. Deep learning in photoacoustic imaging: A review10.1117/1.jbo.26.4.040901 ↗
15. Deep learning for biomedical photoacoustic imaging: A review10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100241 ↗
16. Review of deep learning for photoacoustic imaging10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100215 ↗
17. Deep learning enables superior photoacoustic imaging at ultralow laser dosages10.1002/advs.202003097 ↗
18. Deep learning acceleration of multiscale superresolution localization photoacoustic imaging10.1038/s41377-022-00820-w ↗
19. Deep neural network-based sinogram super-resolution and bandwidth enhancement for limited-data photoacoustic tomography10.1109/tuffc.2020.2977210 ↗
20. Deep learning approach to improve tangential resolution in photoacoustic tomography10.1364/boe.410145 ↗
21. Deep learning optoacoustic tomography with sparse data10.1038/s42256-019-0095-3 ↗
22. Deep learning improves contrast in low-fluence photoacoustic imaging10.1364/boe.395683 ↗
23. Enabling fast and high quality LED photoacoustic imaging: A recurrent neural networks based approach10.1364/boe.9.003852 ↗
24. Deep learning-enhanced LED-based photoacoustic imaging10.1117/12.2545654 ↗
25. U-Net enhanced real-time LED-based photoacoustic imaging10.1002/jbio.202300465 ↗
26. M. Mirza and S.Osindero, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,” arXiv:1411.1784 (2014).
27. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks
28. Generative adversarial networks: An overview10.1109/msp.2017.2765202 ↗
29. Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review10.1016/j.media.2019.101552 ↗
30. Enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio for real-time LED-based photoacoustic imaging systems using denoising cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks10.1117/12.3003312 ↗
31. Improved Noise2Noise denoising with limited data
32. J. Lehtinen , “Noise2Noise: Learning image restoration without clean data,” arXiv:1803.04189 (2018).
33. Self-augmented noisy image for Noise2Noise image denoising10.1109/access.2024.3402748 ↗
34. Zero-shot Noise2Noise: Efficient image denoising without any data
35. Persistence images: A stable vector representation of persistent homology10.48550/arXiv.1507.06217 ↗
36. Using persistent homology and dynamical distances to analyze protein binding10.1515/sagmb-2015-0057 ↗
37. Topology of deep neural networks10.48550/arXiv.2004.06093 ↗
38. Enhancing signal-to-noise ratio in real-time LED-based photoacoustic imaging: A comparative study of CNN-based deep learning architectures10.1016/j.pacs.2024.100674 ↗
39. 2021 · 1
40. Enhanced Pix2Pix dehazing network
41. Pix2Pix-based stain-to-stain translation: A solution for robust stain normalization in histopathology images analysis
42. Pix2Pix generative adversarial network for low dose myocardial perfusion SPECT denoising10.21037/qims-21-1042 ↗
43. On nonparametric estimation of the value of a linear functional in Gaussian white noise10.1137/1129002 ↗
44. A novel image encryption scheme based on CCNN10.1088/1402-4896/ad1d42 ↗
45. Analysis and comparison of Gaussian noise denoising algorithms
46. Estimation and removal of Gaussian noise in digital images
47. Photon, poisson noise10.1007/978-0-387-31439-6_482 ↗
48. Salt and pepper noise: Effects and removal10.30630/joiv.2.4.151 ↗
49. When is speckle noise multiplicative?10.1364/ao.21.001157 ↗
50. Subspace-based technique for speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images10.1186/1475-925x-13-154 ↗
51. Savitzky–Golay smoothing filters10.1063/1.4822961 ↗
52. 1990
53. A nonlinear primal-dual method for total variation-based image restoration10.1137/s1064827596299767 ↗
54. A non-local algorithm for image denoising
55. Image denoising with block-matching and 3D filtering10.1117/12.643267 ↗
56. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation
57. K. Janocha and W. M.Czarnecki, “On loss functions for deep neural networks in classification,” arXiv:1702.05659 (2017).10.4467/20838476SI.16.004.6185 ↗
58. A general and adaptive robust loss function
59. H. Zhao , “Loss functions for neural networks for image processing,” arXiv:1511.08861 (2015).
60. The effect of loss function on conditional generative adversarial networks10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.02.018 ↗
61. A Large-Scale Study on Regularization and Normalization in GANs10.48550/arXiv.1807.04720 ↗
62. Stochastic gradient descent tricks
63. Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization
64. RMSProp and equilibrated adaptive learning rates for non-convex optimization
65. D. P. Kingma and J.Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
66. A method for solving the convex programming problem with convergence rate O(1/k^2)
67. S. Ruder , “An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms,” arXiv:abs/1609.04747 (2016).
68. L. Liu , “On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond,” arXiv:abs/1908.03265 (2019).
69. J. Zhuang , “AdaBelief optimizer: Adapting stepsizes by the belief in observed gradients,” arXiv:abs/2010.07468 (2020).
70. Adaptive methods for nonconvex optimization
71. Comparative study of convolution neural network’s Relu and Leaky-Relu activation functions
72. On the convergence and mode collapse of GAN10.1145/3283254.3283282 ↗
73. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift
74. Weight Normalization: A Simple Reparameterization to Accelerate Training of Deep
75. T. Miyato , “Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks,” arXiv:abs/1802.05957 (2018).
76. Fast construction of the Vietoris–Rips complex10.1016/j.cag.2010.03.007 ↗
77. The Vietoris–Rips complexes of a circle10.2140/pjm.2017.290.1 ↗
78. Ripser.py: A lean persistent homology library for Python10.21105/joss.00925 ↗
79. The accuracy of PSNR in predicting video quality for different video scenes and frame rates10.1007/s11235-010-9351-x ↗
80. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity10.1109/tip.2003.819861 ↗
81. Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines
82. B. Xu , “Empirical evaluation of rectified activations in convolutional network,” arXiv:abs/1505.00853 (2015).
83. A fast approach for no-reference image sharpness assessment based on maximum local variation10.1109/lsp.2014.2314487 ↗