Improved high-precision regional marine geomagnetic anomaly field model using Legendre polynomial expansion
Source abstract
Abstract
Regional geomagnetic field models can provide detailed insights into the geomagnetic field and are of substantial value for precise maritime navigation and the detection of marine targets. In light of the polynomial model’s numerous advantages, including straightforward computation, rapid computation speed, and high model resolution, this study delves into the polynomial modeling method. To address the challenges of enhancing solution precision, selecting the optimal polynomial function, and determining the optimal truncation degree, it introduces an improved method based on singular value decomposition to enhance the model’s accuracy at higher degrees. A comparison of the Taylor polynomial model, the Laguerre polynomial model, and the Chebyshev polynomial model revealed the superiority of the Legendre polynomial model in terms of truncation degree, modeling accuracy, and boundary effect. In addition, by employing K-fold cross-validation, the complete dataset is effectively leveraged for both fitting and validation, thereby facilitating the identification of the optimal truncation degree for each polynomial model. The superior accuracy of the regional geomagnetic field models is validated through a comparative analysis of the calculation results derived from the EMM2017 model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Geological and Geophysical Studies · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Electrical Engineering, Naval University of Engineering , Wuhan 430030,
Funding
National Science Foundation for Outstanding Young Scholars of China · Youth Found of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. The Earth’s magnetic field
2. Swarm: A constellation to study the Earth’s magnetic field10.1186/bf03351933 ↗
3. Regional geomagnetic core field and secular variation model over the Iberian Peninsula from 2014 to 2020 based on the R-SCHA technique10.1186/s40623-023-01873-w ↗
4. Geomagnetic core field models and secular variation forecasts for the 13th International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF-13)10.1186/s40623-020-01254-7 ↗
5. 2020
6. Selection of geomagnetic matching feature elements based on IGRF13 and WMM2020 models10.6038/pg2022FF0379 ↗
7. Analysis of main magnetic field in Chinese mainland based on WMM2020 and IGRF1310.1117/12.2627893 ↗
8. The CHAOS-7 geomagnetic field model and observed changes in the South Atlantic Anomaly10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9 ↗
9. Fast and accurate evaluation of geomagnetic field elements at arbitrary points in space10.1093/gji/ggaa439 ↗
10. Geomagnetic field-based localization with bicubic interpolation for mobile robots10.1007/s12555-014-0143-z ↗
11. Interpolating geomagnetic observations
12. Research on geomagnetic indoor positioning based on different spatial interpolation methods10.25236/IJFET.2022.040711 ↗
13. Geomagnetic anomaly mapping by multi-fractal measure kriging interpolation method
14. Geomagnetic reference map super-resolution using convolutional neural network10.1088/1361-6501/acf7db ↗
15. Regional gravity field modeling based on rectangular harmonic analysis10.1007/s11430-013-4784-1 ↗
16. Modelling by spherical cap harmonic analysis: A literature review10.1007/s10712-019-09576-2 ↗
17. Spherical cap harmonic analysis of regional magnetic anomalies based on CHAMP satellite data10.1007/s11770-016-0567-8 ↗
18. The geomagnetic field in China and neighboring regions for the 2010.0 epoch10.6038/cjg20160425 ↗
19. Data fitting and modeling of regional geomagnetic field10.1007/s11770-015-0500-6 ↗
20. Study on key technologies of construction of marine geomagnetic filed model based on polynomial method
21. Study on establishing local marine geomagnetic field model
22. Study of regional geomagnetic model of Fujian and adjacent areas based on 3D Taylor Polynomial model10.6038/cjg20160602 ↗
23. Taylor polynomial model of the geomagnetic field in an underground gas storage area10.1134/s0016793220030172 ↗
24. Taylor polynomial spatial reference field method for field geomagnetic diurnal variation reduction10.1134/s1069351322110015 ↗
25. LU-Cholesky QR algorithms for thin QR decomposition10.1016/j.parco.2019.102571 ↗
26. Matrix inversion using Cholesky decomposition
27. QR decomposition-based matrix inversion for high performance embedded MIMO receivers10.1109/tsp.2011.2105485 ↗
28. A generalized least-square matrix decomposition10.1080/01621459.2013.852978 ↗
29. Improving the use of the randomized singular value decomposition for the inversion of gravity and magnetic data10.1190/geo2019-0603.1 ↗
30. Large SVD computations for analysis of inverse problems in geophysics
31. Singular value decomposition (SVD)10.1007/978-1-4419-9887-3_5 ↗
32. B. Meyer , R. W.Saltus, and A.Chulliat, “EMAG2-v3: A new global compilation of lithospheric magnetic anomalies,” GP43A-1210, 2016.
33. Quality evaluation of sea level data in the Earth magnetic anomaly grid at 2 arc minute resolution version 3 (EMAG2v3): Taking the Sulu Sea in southeast Asia and the southern section of the Kolbeinsey Ridge in the Arctic as an example10.6038/pg2023GG0331 ↗
34. Evaluation of nitrate load estimations using neural networks and canonical correlation analysis with K-fold cross-validation10.3390/su12010400 ↗
35. What is an optimal value of k in k-fold cross-validation in discrete Bayesian network analysis?10.1007/s00180-020-00999-9 ↗
36. Performance of machine learning algorithms with different K values in K-fold cross-validation10.5815/ijitcs.2021.06.05 ↗