Simulation and experimental studies of mechanical delamination characteristics of REBCO tapes and lap joints under transverse tension
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the delamination properties of high-temperature superconducting REBa2Cu3O7−x (REBCO) coated conductor (CC) tapes and lap joints under transverse tension by a finite element model (FEM) based on the cohesive zone model. The interfacial cohesive strength and the initial penalty stiffness used in the FEM calculations are adopted based on the experimental data obtained from the anvil tensile tests. Compared to previous theoretical studies, our calculation results of the delamination behaviors for the REBCO CC tapes and the lap joints are more approaching to the experimental data, and the abrupt failure behavior of the transverse load–displacement curves, which appears in the anvil tests, is reproduced by the simulations. Moreover, the effects of welding strength between the upper and lower tapes and internal tape damage during the welding process on the delamination characteristics, including the delamination strength, initial separation, delamination locations, and damage distribution of the CC lap joints, are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechano-Electronic Engineering, Xidian University 1 , Xi’an 710071, China
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Space Extreme Detection 2 , Xi’an 710071, China
Innova Superconductor Technology Co. Ltd. 3 , Beijing 100176, China
Beijing Key Laboratory on HTS Materials and Application Technology 4 , Beijing 100176, China
Funding
Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 27 · 04400310.1088/0953-2048/27/4/044003 ↗
2. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 33 · 09500710.1088/1361-6668/ab9ad0 ↗
3. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2018 · 28 · 520730510.1109/TASC.2018.2816265 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2009 · 19 · 335610.1109/tasc.2009.2018247 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2014 · 24 · 5700205
6. Phys. Procedia · 2012 · 27 · 42410.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.501 ↗
7. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 34 · 01300110.1088/1361-6668/abac1f ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2012 · 22 · 550090410.1109/TASC.2012.2188709 ↗
9. Physica C · 2007 · 463–465 · 73610.1016/j.physc.2007.04.319 ↗
10. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2007 · 20 · 76510.1088/0953-2048/20/8/007 ↗
11. Physica C · 2011 · 471 · 43710.1016/j.physc.2011.03.009 ↗
12. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 27 · 02500110.1088/0953-2048/27/2/025001 ↗
13. Physica C · 2010 · 470 · 67410.1016/j.physc.2010.06.009 ↗
14. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2014 · 85 · 12511510.1063/1.4904736 ↗
15. Physica C · 2013 · 494 · 16310.1016/j.physc.2013.04.062 ↗
16. Physica C · 2014 · 504 · 4710.1016/j.physc.2014.02.011 ↗
17. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 33 · 03500510.1088/1361-6668/ab6dc1 ↗
18. Physica C · 2012 · 473 · 4110.1016/j.physc.2011.11.013 ↗
19. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 29 · 01500310.1088/0953-2048/29/1/015003 ↗
20. Physica C · 2011 · 471 · 48010.1016/j.physc.2011.05.003 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2016 · 26 · 6603406
22. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 27 · 05502310.1088/0953-2048/27/5/055023 ↗
23. Physica C · 2018 · 545 · 2610.1016/j.physc.2017.11.012 ↗
24. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 31 · 07400410.1088/1361-6668/aac55c ↗
25. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 28 · 06400110.1088/0953-2048/28/6/064001 ↗
26. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2012 · 22 · 840040610.1109/tasc.2011.2182349 ↗
27. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2015 · 25 · 6606109
28. Physica C · 2020 · 570 · 135360010.1016/j.physc.2020.1353600 ↗
29. J. Compos. Mater. · 1998 · 32 · 124610.1177/002199839803201401 ↗
30. Physica C · 2011 · 471 · 107110.1016/j.physc.2011.05.126 ↗